Advertisement
In Brief

Clinical news

© LIGHTSPRING/SHUTTERSTOCK
Many patients not on optimal lipid-lowering therapy in year after heart attack

By Nicole MacKee
Only 55% of Australian patients are on optimal lipid-lowering therapy in the year after a heart attack, say researchers.

In a retrospective analysis published in the Medical Journal of Australia, researchers found that 45% of patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were not receiving intensive lipid-lowering therapy, as recommended in most clinical practice guidelines, at six to 12 months’ follow up.

About 24% of patients were receiving some form of lipid-lowering therapy, but not intensive therapy, and almost 22% of patients were not on any lipid-lowering therapy.

Lead researcher Professor David Brieger, Professor of Medicine at The University of Sydney’s Concord Clinical School, said intensive lipid-lowering therapy was key in reducing the risk of subsequent coronary events in high-risk patients.

‘Clinical trials suggest statins result in relative risk reduction of approximately 25% with high-dose statins providing incremental benefit beyond this,’ Professor Brieger told Medicine Today. ‘As these patients have a high incidence of recurrent events – up to 10% per year in some analyses – this translates to a large absolute benefit.’

The researchers evaluated data for 3441 patients enrolled in the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE) in 2015-2016. Intensive lipid-lowering therapy was defined as treatment with: atorvastatin (40 mg or more daily), rosuvastatin (20 mg or more daily) or simvastatin (80 mg or more daily), with or without ezetimibe; lower intensity statin therapy with ezetimibe; or ezetimibe alone.

About one in five patients was discharged from hospital without a prescription for intensive lipid-lowering therapy, and this was the leading predictor for not being on therapy at follow up (odds ratio [OR], 7.24).

Other predictors of suboptimal therapy at follow up were not taking intensive lipid-lowering therapy before hospital admission (OR, 1.53) and being a woman (OR, 1.20).

Professor Brieger said it was not clear why some patients were discharged from hospital without being prescribed intensive lipid-lowering therapy, but physician error, patient intolerance and patient refusal were contributing factors.
Med J Aust 2018; doi: 10.5694/mja2.12035.