Who owns human tissue: patients, hospitals, researchers or others?

Who owns the human tissue stored in a laboratory after surgery or research? Is it ‘property’ like a watch or a book? Is it capable of being ‘owned’ in a legal sense? If it is not property, how else could human tissue be categorised? Is it necessary to legally categorise it at all?

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has recently taken the first step in answering these questions: it ruled that tissue removed from the body is legally property so that it can be ‘owned’. However, the court did not have to decide the more difficult question of who owns it.