Peer Reviewed
Feature Article Men’s health
CPD
Complete 1.5 CPD hours

Erectile dysfunction. Part 1: Patient assessment and treatment options

Chris G. Mcmahon, Chelsea N. Mcmahon
Image
Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) may be an early manifestation of generalised endothelial dysfunction and a predictor of other forms of cardiovascular disease, suggesting a need for screening. ED treatments include oral medications, intracavernous injection pharmacotherapy, vacuum constriction devices and penile prostheses, alone or in combination with graded levels of psychosexual counselling.

Key Points
    • Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common and can be treated pharmacologically in most men.
    • ED may be a predictor and a precursor of other forms of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.
    • The patient’s cardiovascular status and overall fitness for renewed sexual activity should be assessed before initiation of ED treatment.
    • Oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors are effective in 65 to 70% of men with ED; their efficacy is significantly reduced in patients with severe vasculogenic ED, diabetic ED and ED after radical prostatectomy.
    • Alprostadil is the drug of first choice for self- administered intracavernous injections and is effective in 70% of men with ED, with a low risk of priapism and penile fibrosis.
    • Intrapenile prostheses are effective treatments in men with ED unresponsive to pharmacotherapy.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common male sexual dysfunction that is associated with a reduced quality of life for men and their partners. In the past three decades, advances in our understanding of the physiology of erection have resulted in parallel changes in the approach to evaluation and treatment of men with ED. The ED treatment paradigm has evolved from the previous psychosexual model to a new integrated treatment model that incorporates oral and intracavernous injection pharmacotherapy, devices and prostheses, alone or in combination with graded levels of psychosexual counselling. The link between coronary artery disease and vasculogenic ED is now well established, with implications for cardiovascular screening of men with ED. 

In this first of a series of two articles on ED, we discuss assessment of men with ED and treatment options, including oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, intracavernous alprostadil injections, devices and prostheses. In Part 2 of the series, in the April issue of Medicine Today, we will discuss management of men with ED that is unresponsive to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. 

Epidemiology

A range of definitions of ED have been proposed by different expert bodies.1-3 The most commonly quoted National Institutes of Health (NIH) definition of ED is the inability to get or keep an erection firm enough for satisfactory sexual intercourse.1

Epidemiological data from Australian, US and UK observational studies estimate the prevalence of complete ED as about 5% among 40-year-olds, 10% among men in their 60s, 15% among men in their 70s and 30 to 40% among men in their 80s. However, only half of the men who self-report ED are concerned about it. Prevalence studies show that, when controlling for other factors, ED is associated with increasing age, depression, obesity, lack of exercise, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, cardiovascular disease and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).4,5 The Multinational Survey on the Aging Male (MSAM-7) study reported that men with LUTS had an overall prevalence of ED of 49%, complete erectile failure in 10% and an overall prevalence of ejaculatory disorders of 46%.6 

Pathophysiology

Penile erection is a neurovascular phenomenon that requires relaxation of arterial and corporal smooth muscle, dilation of penile vasculature and corporal lacunar spaces, increased intracavernosal blood flow and normal veno-occlusive function. Penile vascular disease is the most common cause of organic ED and may involve several pathophysiological mechanisms including impaired arterial inflow, impaired smooth muscle cavernosal relaxation, chronic ischaemia-induced increased cavernosal smooth muscle contraction, cavernosal fibrosis, veno-occlusive dysfunction and chronic or episodic hypoxaemia. Endothelial dysfunction appears to be the final common pathway for many cases of ED.7 ED may be an early manifestation of generalised endothelial dysfunction and a predictor and precursor of other forms of cardiovascular disease.8 More than half of men with ED who have no cardiac symptoms have abnormal results on stress testing, and 40% have significant coronary artery disease when studied.9

Apart from age, the main risk factors for ED are those for vascular disease: smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, abnormal lipid profile, obesity and lack of exercise. Other factors include depression and endocrine disorders (Box 1).

Diabetes 

Erectile dysfunction is reported to occur in 35 to 70% of men with type 2 diabetes.10 Erectile dysfunction occurs at an earlier age in men with diabetes compared with men without diabetes, and the age-adjusted probability of complete ED is nearly three times higher in the former.4,10 More than 50% of men develop ED within 10 years of being diagnosed with diabetes. The prevalence of ED increases with diabetes duration, poor glycaemic control and diabetes complications such as vascular and microvascular disease and neuropathies.11 Studies have found prevalence rates for ED of 49% in patients with type 1 diabetes and 34% and 24% for severe and mild to moderate ED, respectively, in patients with type 2 diabetes.12,13

Neurological disease

Many neurological disorders commonly lead to ED, including spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis and cavernous nerve damage after major pelvic cancer surgery such as radical prostatectomy, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. 

Endocrine disorders

Endocrine disorders such as hypogonadism, hyperprolactinaemia and thyroid disease play a significant role in ED physiology. Testosterone regulates cavernosal nerve structure and function, nitric oxide (NO) synthase expression and activity, phosphodiesterase type 5 and corporal smooth muscle cell growth and differentiation. 

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

Men with BPH have a high prevalence of ED. The reason for this association is unclear. The quality of life of men with BPH is reduced by its effects on sexual function.14

Iatrogenic ED

Antihypertensive and antidepressant drugs may cause ED as an adverse drug reaction, and discontinuation does not always result in the recovery of erectile function. Antihypertensive agents such as thiazide diuretics, nonselective alpha blockers, and beta-2 blockers may cause ED. ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, alpha-1 blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are known to have a low risk of ED.15

Psychogenic contributors 

Although most men with ED have an underlying vascular cause, usually related to endothelial dysfunction, there is always a contributing, sometimes substantial, psychogenic component related to performance anxiety. Treatment of this component alone may be sufficient to restore normal erections. 

Sexuality in the ageing male 

Ageing is a risk factor for ED because of the common pathological conditions in the ageing male, such as atherosclerosis, hypogonadism, chronic diseases associated with organic ED and their treatments which can interfere with sexual function at a central and peripheral level. Ageing is associated with impaired endothelial function and atherosclerosis.16 It is well recognised that androgen decline in ageing men is associated with a reduction in the number and quality of erections, and that testosterone has a central role in endothelial function.17,18

Many older men and their partners are interested in maintaining an active sexual life, often into their 90s. Although the incidence of ED rises significantly with increasing age, recent studies indicate that 55 to 70% of men aged 77 to 79 years are sexually active. It is important not to discriminate against older people wishing to continue or reinstate sexual activity. Older patients may feel especially reluctant to discuss sex and the possibility that their partner may also be experiencing sexual dysfunction requiring specific treatment. Assessment of the severity, extent and aetiology of sexual dysfunction, the approach to diagnosis and the rationale for treatment must be underpinned by a thorough understanding of the changes that occur in the normal male sexual response as men age and when sexual function is disrupted. 

Older men are less capable of achieving an erection solely through sexual fantasy and usually require prolonged and more intense physical stimulation. The erectile response will generally take longer, and the erection may not be as rigid as when younger. Erections in older men are often less stable, with many men experiencing some softening of their erection during sexual activity. The refractory period, or time after ejaculation before a man can develop a subsequent erection, increases progressively as men age. Many potent older men have a refractory period of several days. Both the intensity of ejaculation and the volume of ejaculate may be less in older men. These men may also experience some delay in ejaculation due to an age-related degenerative reduction in penile skin sensitivity coupled with some postmenopausal loss of pelvic floor muscle tone in their often multiparous partners. All of these changes are a normal part of the male ageing process. Patients need to understand the nature of these changes so that they do not become anxious and concerned as their sexual responses alter.

Evaluation of patients with ED

A full medical and personally and culturally sensitive sexual history and a thorough clinical examination of the patient are needed to:

  • confirm that the patient is experiencing ED or another sexual dysfunction such as hypoactive desire or premature ejaculation
  • assess the onset, severity and duration of the condition and its impact on the man’s partner
  • identify the presence and contribution of potentially reversible causes (medications, drug or alcohol abuse), risk factors, comorbid disease or psychosocial factors
  • determine whether the cause of ED is psychogenic, organic (e.g. vasculogenic, endocrine, neurological or end organ disease such as penile deformity due to Peyronie’s disease) or mixed (Box 1)
  • assess the fitness of the patient to resume sexual activity.

Any relationship between anxiety and ED should be explored. Psychogenic ED is likely in younger men with no vascular risk factors who report an abrupt onset of ED and persistent early morning or nocturnal erections. The causes of psychogenic ED are manifold and include sexual performance anxiety, global anxiety, relationship problems, depression, guilt and fear. Careful enquiry should be made about current medications, such as thiazide diuretics, nonselective alpha blockers, beta-2 blockers and antidepressants, as well as the use of recreational drugs. 

Several patient self-administered questionnaires have been validated to objectively score erectile function. The short five-question form of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) – the IIEF-5 or Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) – is useful for both diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment (Box 2).19

Physical examination 

A focused physical examination in men with ED includes general body habitus and genital anatomy and should identify any related genital abnormalities (e.g. Peyronie’s plaques), endocrine signs and possible comorbidities (neurological, vascular and possible life-threatening conditions).20 The gently stretched flaccid penis should be carefully palpated to identify any fibrous Peyronie’s plaques or phimosis. The presence, size and consistency of testes and adnexa should be determined to evaluate the presence of atrophy and androgen status. Screening for prostate adenocarcinoma with a digital rectal examination and measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men over the age of 50 years is prudent but not mandatory, except in men with an increased risk of prostate adenocarcinoma or LUTS suggesting BPH. 

Clinical investigations 

Laboratory investigations

The degree to which men should undergo clinical investigation depends on the history and examination findings.21-28 General investigations include measurement of serum concentrations of total testosterone (before 10 am), fasting glucose, fasting lipids and PSA in men over 50 years of age and selected high-risk or LUTS-symptomatic patients.21,23,24,27,29 

There is a general consensus that screening for low testosterone levels with a morning total testosterone assay (8.00 am to 11.00 am) is the investigation of choice and is appropriate in men with ED and hypoactive sexual desire, an incomplete response to PDE5-inhibitor treatment or delayed ejaculation and in all men with known diabetes.21-28,30-32 The prevalence of low total testosterone levels in men with ED varies widely across studies, ranging from 12.5 to 35%.30 The threshold of testosterone level to maintain an erection is low (less than 5.5 nmol/L), and ED is usually a symptom of more severe cases of hypogonadism.21 If the total testosterone level is 12 nmol/L or higher, testosterone deficiency is unlikely.31 

If the total testosterone level is less than 12 nmol/L then proceed to a second morning venous blood sample drawn after an interval of at least one week, together with serum measurement of luteinising hormone (LH) and prolactin levels. Serum LH measurement is essential to identify the subtype of testosterone deficiency as primary or secondary. Measurement of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) may be useful in older and obese men or men with liver cirrhosis, with chronic, suspicious symptoms and a borderline total testosterone level. Hyperprolactinaemia has a causal association with hypogonadotrophic (secondary) hypogonadism. Haemochromatosis has a causal association with both hypergonadotrophic (primary) and hypogonadotrophic (secondary) hypogonadism. 

Undiagnosed type 2 diabetes has been reported in 5 to 12% of men with ED.33 Measurement of the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and HbA1c will identify occult impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose (FPG 5.6 to 6.9 nmol/L; HbA1c ≥39 mmol/mol [≥5.7%]) or type 2 diabetes (FPG ≥7.0 nmol/L; HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol [≥6.5%]). A 75 g oral 2-hour glucose tolerance test may be required.34 

Further optional and complementary investigations may be indicated based on the history, examination findings and results of these initial investigations. These may include iron studies, measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and other pituitary hormone levels, pituitary imaging studies, chromosome analysis, full blood count and urinalysis.20,21,26

Specialised testing

Most patients do not need further investigations unless specifically indicated. Indications for the following specialised investigations include:35 

  • patients who wish to know the aetiology of their ED
  • young patients with lifelong ED
  • patients with a history of pelvic, perineal or genital trauma
  • patients with an abnormality of the testes or penis found on examination
  • patients unresponsive to medical therapies who may desire surgical treatment for ED.

Psychological assessment 

Psychological assessment of men with ED may provide information on the contribution of relationships, cultural and religious factors, depression and other psychological factors.21-28 Patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders or younger men with lifelong primary ED should be referred to a psychiatrist or psychologist with an interest in sexual health.21,36 

Intracavernous injection test

The intracavernous injection test is an office test that involves a physician-administered intracavernous injection of a vasoactive drug such as alprostadil followed by assessment of penile rigidity after 10 minutes.37 The development of a rigid erection within 10 minutes that lasts for 30 minutes suggests psychogenic ED.38 However, the use of intracavernous injection as a diagnostic test is limited as a positive result can also be found in patients with mild vascular disease.28 The main use of this test is in the assessment of penile deformities to aid surgical management.35

Vascular testing 

Colour duplex Doppler imaging may be indicated in young men with lifelong (primary) ED or Peyronie’s disease, men unresponsive to ED pharmacotherapy or men wishing to know the cause of their ED. 

Contemporary management of ED rarely includes penile pharmacoangiography, dynamic intracavernous cavernosometry and cavernosography (DICC), nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR), neurophysiological testing, vascular reconstructive surgery or venous ligation surgery.22

Impact of an ED diagnosis

It is increasingly recognised that a diagnosis of ED can have a profound impact on the quality of life of patients and their partners.39 ED can lead to withdrawal from intimacy, avoidance of all physical contact with a partner and an increase in emotional stress, which itself can perpetuate any psychogenic component of the ED. The condition can affect a man’s self-esteem and self-image and lead to anxiety and depression. Treatment of ED has been shown to lead to resolution of depression, restoration of self-esteem and improvement in quality of life.40

Treatment options

Treatment of ED usually requires initial lifestyle modification to reduce the impact of comorbid vascular risk factors and treatment of organic or psychosexual dysfunction with either pharmacotherapy alone or in combination with psychosexual therapy. The efficacy, benefits, appropriateness and risks of treatment should be discussed with patients and their partners so that their treatment expectations are realistic. 

The treatment options for men with ED are effective, safe and well tolerated (Box 3). Treatment selection depends on the severity and aetiology of ED, the patient’s overall health and comorbid disease and the patient’s and their partner’s choice. Progression from first-line oral agents through second- and third-line therapies is indicated in treatment failures.

Coronary artery disease and risk  

ED and coronary artery disease share the risk factors of dyslipidaemia, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, obesity, lack of physical activity and a family history of early onset coronary artery disease. Erectile dysfunction may be a predictor and a precursor of other forms of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.8 ED confers a 1.46-fold increased risk for cardiovascular disease.41 Men with proven or suspected vasculogenic ED or multiple vascular risk factors, especially diabetes, should be screened for silent myocardial ischaemia with a treadmill stress ECG, CT coronary artery calcium scoring or CT coronary angiography.41 

The Second Princeton Consensus Panel Guidelines for managing ED in patients with cardiovascular disease recommend assigning patients according to their risk factors to one of three risk levels: low, intermediate or high (Flowchart).15 These cardiovascular risk categories can form the basis for a treatment decision for initiating or resuming sexual activity. 

Most men with coronary artery disease can safely resume sexual activity and undergo treatment for ED after appropriate education and counselling.42 The cardiac risk of sexual activity in men with cardiovascular disease is minimal in properly assessed and advised patients. There is no evidence that currently approved ED treatments add to the overall cardiovascular risk in patients with or without previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease.

Lifestyle changes and risk factor modification

Lifestyle changes and risk factor modification must precede or accompany any pharmacological or psychological ED treatment.21-28 Lifestyle changes in men with comorbid cardiovascular or metabolic disorders, such as diabetes or hypertension, or psychosocial issues may achieve major clinical benefits.43 Cessation of smoking, maintaining an ideal body weight, engaging in regular exercise and optimal management of these diseases may prevent the development of ED.44-47 

In the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, men who started physical activity in midlife had a 70% reduced risk for ED relative to those who remained sedentary, and regular exercise produced a significantly lower incidence of ED over an 8-year follow-up period.46 Similarly, in a multicentre, randomised, open-label study of obese men, intensive exercise and weight loss significantly improved erectile function.45 Correction of dyslipidaemia may improve ED within three months and significantly augment the response to ED pharmacotherapy in patients with unresponsive or refractory ED.47 However, data conflict on the benefit of smoking cessation to improve erectile function.

Psychosexual therapy

Psychosexual therapy for ED is not standardised, as the foundation of anxiety varies between patients.48 Relationship difficulties, depression, guilt, previous sexual abuse, lack of sexual experience and problems with intimacy may all increase anxiety and conflict, which may then manifest as ED. Psychosexual treatments range from simple sex coaching and education through improved partner communication to cognitive behavioural therapy and are often combined with ED pharmacotherapy. 

A large proportion of patients experience negative psychological consequences of organic ED, which may result in progressively worsening performance anxiety and further deterioration of erectile function.49 Collaboration between the physician and psychosexual counsellor is often required to develop and implement an integrated pharmacotherapy/ psychotherapy treatment program. 

Oral PDE5 inhibitor therapy

Overall, 60 to 65% of men with ED, including those with hypertension, diabetes, spinal cord injury and other comorbid medical conditions, can successfully complete intercourse in response to a PDE5 inhibitor such as sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil or avanafil.50-52 The PDE5 inhibitors selectively inhibit the PDE5 isoenzyme, increasing the amount of cyclic GMP available for smooth muscle relaxation, and induce vasodilatation, increased corporal blood flow and erection (Figure 1). The efficacy of the different PDE5 inhibitors appears similar and is related to the severity of ED, with significantly reduced efficacy in patients with severe vasculogenic ED, diabetic ED and ED after radical prostatectomy.50-52 Sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil and avanafil have differing pharmacokinetic properties (Table). 

Daily dosing with tadalafil has similar efficacy and side effect rates to on-demand PDE5 inhibitors and is often selected as first-line treatment by men who engage in frequent intercourse or regard sexual intercourse spontaneity as a key treatment goal.53 Daily dosing may improve endothelial function and improve or restore erectile function. Salvage of on-demand tadalafil failures with daily or alternate-day high-dose tadalafil (10 to 20 mg) has been reported but is limited by the relatively high cost of treatment.54 

Adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors are usually transient, mild to moderate in nature and dose dependent. They often attenuate or disappear within four to six weeks of continued use.50-52 The most commonly reported adverse effects are:

  • headache (11 to 16%)
  • facial flushing (2 to 11%)
  • dyspepsia (4 to 10%)
  • muscle or backache (0 to 4%) 
  • nasal congestion (2 to 9%). 

Nonarteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) has been linked to PDE5 inhibitors, although a causal relationship has not been established. In a population of four million veterans aged over 50 years with ED treated with PDE5 inhibitors, there was no increased risk for NAION.55 However, loss of vision or reduced vision requires urgent ophthalmological assessment and immediate cessation of PDE5 inhibitor use.

PDE5 inhibitors may exacerbate the hypotensive effects of aerosol, tablet or topical short- or long-acting organic nitrates, such as glyceryl trinitrate or isosorbide dinitrate. Coadministration is contraindicated. 

Intracavernous injection therapy

Patient-administered intracavernous injection therapy using vasodilator drugs such as alprostadil is an effective treatment for ED (Box 4).56 It is particularly useful in men who fail to respond to oral pharmacological agents.57 Alprostadil resulted in an erection of sufficient rigidity for sexual intercourse in 72.6% of men with ED.56 

The principal side effects of intracavernous injection of alprostadil are pain at the site of injection (up to 30% of patients) and corporal fibrosis resulting in the development of penile nodules and curvature (9 to 23.3% of mid and long-term users).56 Priapism is a rare complication that can cause irreversible ischaemic damage to the corpora cavernosa with subsequent fibrotic damage and permanent loss of erectile function. 

Polyagent pharmacotherapy of alprostadil combined with other agents such as papaverine or phentolamine (available through accredited and licensed compounding pharmacists) is effective in 91.6% of patients and appears effective as ‘salvage therapy’ in treating patients with severe vasculogenic ED unresponsive to oral pharmacotherapy.56 Intracavernous injection therapy combined with on-demand PDE5 inhibitors has also been reported as effective salvage therapy and potentially allows lower drug doses with a reduced incidence of adverse effects.58 

Relative contraindications to intracavernous injection therapy include anticoagulation, previous poor compliance and a history of priapism.

Vacuum constriction devices

Vacuum constriction devices involve insertion of the flaccid penis into a vacuum cylinder and creation of a vacuum using an integrated hand- or battery-operated vacuum pump to create marked tumescence or rigidity, which is maintained with a constricting ring at the base of the penis.59 A vacuum constriction erection differs from a physiological erection as trabecular smooth-muscle relaxation does not occur and blood is merely trapped within the corpora cavernosa distal to the constricting ring (Figure 2). 

Although 60 to 70% of men can eventually master the use of a vacuum constriction device and manage sexual intercourse, satisfaction rates vary considerably from as low as 27% in the short term, to as high as 69% with two-year follow-up.59 Vacuum constriction devices are more popular in older age group couples but require substantial enthusiasm and understanding partners.59 Adverse effects include bruising, obstructed and occasionally painful ejaculation, pain at the site of the ring and penile instability due to pivoting of the base of the penis. 

Surgical treatment

Surgical treatment of ED is usually limited to patients with major penile arterial  or venous disease, corporal fibrosis or Peyronie’s disease, who are either unresponsive to or are not candidates for ED pharmacotherapy. 

Multicomponent inflatable penile implants are associated with high satisfaction rates.60,61 Device failure and prosthetic infection are uncommon. Infection requires removal of the prosthesis and either immediate replacement or delayed staged reimplantation. 

Penile arterial revascularisation and venous ligation surgery are associated with relatively poor outcomes in men with penile atherosclerotic disease or corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction.59 They are rarely required, with the exception of young men with traumatic occlusion or stenosis of the internal pudendal or common penile artery due to an anterior open-book type pelvic fracture.

Emerging treatments

There are several potential therapeutic targets with emerging treatments and novel drug delivery systems for ED. These include guanylate cyclase activators, which increase NO levels and promote vasodilation. They also include RhoA/ Rho-kinase inhibitors, which prevent the development of vasculogenic ED, with a mechanism often independent of endothelial NO activity.62 Orodispersible formulations of both vardenafil and sildenafil offer improved biocompatibility, biodegradability, ease of scalability and enhanced solubility release patterns.63,64 

Regenerative medicine using tissue engineering and molecular biology to replace, engineer or regenerate corporal tissue has the potential to improve penile haemodynamics and renew cavernosal smooth muscle function, thereby preventing or reversing ED. However, convincing supportive human clinical trial data are lacking. There is emerging evidence to support the use of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LIESWT), especially in men with vasculogenic ED, but most clinical trials are small, single centre studies with poor study methodology.65 Furthermore, the attempt to rapidly commercialise LIESWT without adequate supportive data is a concern. Gene therapy, stem cell therapy using autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells enhanced by vascular endothelial growth factor or LIESWT, platelet-rich plasma and autologous tissue engineering remain experimental and have no place currently in the management of ED.66-69 

Unproven treatments

Herbal and unproven drugs and medical device treatments with no evidence base to support their efficacy and safety are now commonly advertised to the public. These advertisements often make unsubstantiated statements about global efficacy and absent adverse effects and are often unjustifiably expensive. Patients should be advised to avoid these types of treatment and to consult their GPs with any problems.

Erectile dysfunction in special populations

Benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms 

Recent studies have shown a clear association between ED and benign prostatic hyperplasia with LUTS.14 The association is independent of age, but the more severe the LUTS the more severe the ED. Recent data have not only confirmed this association but also demonstrated a moderate effect of tadalafil on patients with LUTS. 

Prostate cancer

ED is a common consequence of treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma with radical retropubic prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy or androgen deprivation therapy.70,71 The aetiology of ED after radical retropubic prostatectomy includes operative injury to the cavernous nerves and subsequent increased hypoxia-induced production of transforming growth factor in the corpora cavernosa, leading to increased extracellular matrix deposition, inhibition of smooth muscle growth, apoptosis of corporal smooth muscle, fibrosis and eventually structurally based corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction.70 

Almost all men with postprostatectomy ED fail to respond initially to PDE5 inhibitors, but treatment with self-administered intracavernous injection therapy has a high response rate and increases the subsequent response to PDE5 inhibitors and the likelihood of eventual restoration of spontaneous erections.72 Recovery of cavernous nerve function is more likely in men younger than 60 years who have normal preoperative erectile function and undergo nerve-sparing surgery. However, recovery may be protracted and incomplete, resulting in a failure to respond to PDE5 inhibitors for as long as 24 to 36 months or the need for long-term penile injection therapy or the insertion of a penile prosthesis.73 There is early evidence to support a potential rehabilitative role for daily PDE5 inhibitors as an adjunct to initial treatment with intracavernous injection therapy in promoting the return of erectile function in men who undergo nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.74

Erectile dysfunction after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy is insidious and progressive and is due to radiation-induced microvascular endarteritis of the penile arteries, possible acceleration of pre-existing atherosclerosis or proximal corporal fibrosis. The response rate to PDE5 inhibitors is similar to that of age-matched men with ED with other causes.75

Androgen blockade with androgen receptor blocking drugs (cyproterone acetate, flutamide, bicalutamide) or luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists (goserelin, leuprorelin) is often associated with hypoactive sexual desire, ED, delayed ejaculation, anejaculation and anorgasmia.76 Erectile dysfunction due to androgen blockade can be a challenge to treat, although treatment is often not requested because of hypoactive sexual desire. The response to PDE5 inhibitors is reduced as the low testosterone levels reduce expression of both the NO synthase gene and the PDE5 gene and downregulate PDE5 enzyme. Similarly the response to self-administered intracavernous injection therapy is also reduced. 

Peyronie’s disease 

Peyronie’s disease is curvature of the penis caused by localised fibrosis within the tunica albuginea. The affected corpora cavernosa cannot lengthen on erection, leading to curvature. The condition is most common in middle-aged men who are sexually active. Its exact aetiology remains unknown, but it may result from trauma and bleeding into the tunica, followed by activation of the inflammatory process and fibrosis. It is regarded as a disorder of wound healing, is associated with similar conditions such as Dupuytren’s contracture and Ledderhose disease and may have an inherited basis.77

ED occurs in 30 to 40% of men with Peyronie’s disease. Although the mechanism of ED in this group is not clearly understood, most appear to have a vascular problem such as arterial insufficiency, where the fibrosis distorts the vessels, or failure of the veno-occlusive mechanism. 

Treatment is influenced by whether the man with Peyronie’s disease also has ED. Men with both conditions may be best advised to undergo insertion of a penile implant, as surgical straightening of the penis alone is unlikely to overcome the ED. If penile curvature alone is the factor that precludes intercourse, medical or surgical treatment may be indicated. Medical treatment is limited to noncalcified plaques and curvatures less than 70 degrees. It is usually multimodal and may include antifibrotic agents such as pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline) and intraplaque infiltrations with collagenase clostridium histolyticum or verapamil.78,79 Surgical correction of the curvature by Nesbit type plication or plaque excision and grafting is indicated for severe or complex curvature. This surgery may be associated with penile shortening and the onset of ED. 

Renal failure 

Chronic renal impairment is associated with a high incidence of ED, with the incidence increasing with the level of creatinine. Erectile dysfunction is present in about 50% of patients by the time they require dialysis and is associated with anaemia, autonomic neuropathy, reduced testosterone levels with elevated prolactin, accelerated arterial disease, other drug therapies and psychological stress. Erythropoietin treatment and transplantation with normalisation of renal function often restore or improve the patient’s overall quality of life and erectile function. 

Conclusion

ED is common and is associated with a reduced quality of life for both affected men and their partners. ED is linked with risk factors that include obesity, lack of exercise, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, cardiovascular disease and cigarette smoking. ED may be the initial sign of generalised endothelial dysfunction and is a predictor of cardiovascular health and silent myocardial ischaemia. Treatment with ED pharmacotherapy alone or in combination with graded psychosexual therapy is effective in improving or restoring sexual function in most men.      MT

 

COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

 

References

1.    National Institutes of Health (NIH). Consensus development conference statement on impotence. December 7-9, 1992. Int J Impot Res 1993; 5: 181-284.
2.    American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: APA; 2013.
3.    World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). 5th ed. WHO; 2016.
4.    Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.  J Urol 1994; 151: 54-61.
5.    Seftel AD, de la Rosette J, Birt J, Porter V, Zarotsky V, Viktrup L. Coexisting lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of epidemiological data. Int J Clin Pract 2013; 67: 32-45. 
6.    Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, et al. [Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging.male (MSAM-7)]. Prog Urol 2004; 14: 332-344.
7.    Saenz de Tejada I, Goldstein I, Azadzoi K, Krane RJ, Cohen RA. Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediated relaxation of penile smooth muscle from diabetic men with impotence. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1025-1030.
8.    Kirby M, Jackson G, Betteridge J, Friedli K. Is erectile dysfunction a marker for cardiovascular disease? Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55: 614-618.
9.    Katsiki N, Wierzbicki AS, Mikhailidis DP. Erectile dysfunction and coronary heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2015; 30: 416-421.
10.    De Berardis G, Franciosi M, Belfiglio M, et al; Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes (QuED) Study Group. Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 284-291.
11.    Fedele D, Coscelli C, Santeusanio F, et al. Erectile dysfunction in diabetic subjects in Italy. Gruppo Italiano Studio Deficit Erettile nei Diabetici. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1973-1977.
12.    De Berardis G, Pellegrini F, Franciosi M, et al; Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Study Group. Identifying patients with type 2 diabetes with a higher likelihood of erectile dysfunction: the role of the interaction between clinical and psychological factors. J Urol 2003; 169: 1422-1428.
13.    Brunner GA, Pieber TR, Schattenberg S, et al. [Erectile dysfunction in patients with type I diabetes mellitus]. Wien Med Wochenschr 1995; 145: 584-586.
14.    Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 2003; 44: 637-649.
15.    Jackson G, Rosen RC, Kloner RA, Kostis JB. The second Princeton consensus on sexual dysfunction and cardiac risk: new guidelines for sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 28-36.
16.    Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Spiegelhalter DJ, Georgakopoulos D, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 471-476.
17.    Gooren LJ. The age-related decline of androgen levels in men: clinically significant? Br J Urol 1996; 78: 763-768.
18.    Allan CA, McLachlan RI. Age-related changes in testosterone and the role of replacement therapy in older men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2004; 60: 653-670.
19.    Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11; 319-326.
20.    Ghanem HM, Salonia A, Martin-Morales A. SOP: physical examination and laboratory testing for men with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 108-110.
21.    Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, et al; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 804-814.
22.    Bella AJ, Lee JC, Carrier S, Bénard F, Brock GB. 2015 CUA practice guidelines for erectile dysfunction. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: 23-29.
23.    Ryu JK, Cho KS, Kim SJ, et al. Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) guideline on erectile dysfunction. World J Mens Health 2013; 31: 83-102.
24.    Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. American Urological Association; 2018. Available online at: www.auanet.org/guidelines/erectile-dysfunction-(ed)-guideline (accessed February 2020).
25.    Hatzimouratidis K, Salonia A, Adaikan G, et al. Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction: recommendations from the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015). J Sex Med 2016; 13: 465-488.
26.    Montorsi F, Adaikan G, Becher E, et al. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 3572-3588.
27.    Hackett G, Kirby M, Wylie K, et al. British Society for Sexual Medicine guidelines on the management of erectile dysfunction in men - 2017. J Sex Med 2018; 15: 430-457. 
28.    Kimoto Y, Nagao K, Sasaki H, et al; Japanese Society for Sexual Medicine. JSSM Guidelines for erectile dysfunction. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 564-576.
29.    Greene KL, Albertsen PC, Babaian RJ, et al; American Urological Association. Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol 2013; 189(1 Suppl): S2-S11.
30.    Qaseem A, Snow V, Denberg TD, et al; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Hormonal testing and pharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 639-649.
31.    Dean JD, McMahon CG, Guay AT, et al. The International Society for Sexual Medicine’s process of care for the assessment and management of testosterone deficiency in adult men. J Sex Med 2015; 12: 1660-1686.
32.    Yeap BB, Grossmann M, McLachlan RI, et al. Endocrine Society of Australia position statement on male hypogonadism (part 1): assessment and indications for testosterone therapy. Med J Aust 2016; 205: 173-178.
33.    McKinlay JB. The worldwide prevalence and epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 2000; 12 Suppl 4: S6-S11.
34.    American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes - 2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41  Suppl 1: S13-S27.
35.    Hackett G, Kell P, Ralph D, et al; British Society for Sexual Medicine. British Society for Sexual Medicine guidelines on the management of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1841-1865.
36.    Capogrosso P, Colicchia M, Ventimiglia E, et al. One patient out of four with newly diagnosed erectile dysfunction is a young man - worrisome picture from the everyday clinical practice. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 1833-1841.
37.    Meuleman EJ, Diemont WL. Investigation of erectile dysfunction. Diagnostic testing for vascular factors in erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 803-819.
38.    Hatzichristou DG, Hatzimouratidis K, Apostolidis A, Ioannidis E, Yannakoyorgos K, Kalinderis A. Hemodynamic characterization of a functional erection. Arterial and corporeal veno-occlusive function in patients with a positive intracavernosal injection test. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 60-67.
39.    Althof SE. Quality of life and erectile dysfunction. Urology 2002; 59: 803-810.
40.    Seidman SN, Roose SP, Menza MA, Shabsigh R, Rosen RC. Treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with depressive symptoms: results of a placebo-controlled trial with sildenafil citrate. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1623-1630.
41.    Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Probstfield JL, Moinpour CM, Coltman CA. Erectile dysfunction and subsequent cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2005; 294: 2996-3002.
42.    Jackson G, Betteridge J, Dean J, et al. A systematic approach to erectile dysfunction in the cardiovascular patient: a consensus statement - update 2002. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56: 663-671.
43.    Gupta BP, Murad MH, Clifton MM, Prokop L, Nehra A, Kopecky SL. The effect of lifestyle modification and cardiovascular risk factor reduction on erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1797-1803.
44.    Bacon CG, Mittleman MA, Kawachi I, Giovannucci E, Glasser DB, Rimm EB. Sexual function in men older than 50 years of age: results from the health professionals follow-up study. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 161-168.
45.    Esposito K, Giugliano F, Di Palo C, et al. Effect of lifestyle changes on erectile dysfunction in obese men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 2978-2984.
46.    Derby CA, Mohr BA, Goldstein I, Feldman HA, Johannes CB, McKinlay JB. Modifiable risk factors and erectile dysfunction: can lifestyle changes modify risk? Urology 2000; 56: 302-306.
47.    Saltzman EA, Guay AT, Jacobson J. Improvement in erectile function in men with organic erectile dysfunction by correction of elevated cholesterol levels: a clinical observation. J Urol 2004; 172: 255-258.
48.    Melnik T, Althof S, Atallah AN, Puga ME, Glina S, Riera R. Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (8): CD008195. 
49.    Althof SE, Seftel AD. The evaluation and management of erectile dysfunction. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1995; 18: 171-192.
50.    Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1397-1404.
51.    Porst H, Rosen R, Padma-Nathan H, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a new, oral, selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction: the first at-home clinical trial. Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 192-199.
52.    Brock GB, McMahon CG, Chen KK, et al. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of integrated analyses. J Urol 2002; 168(4 Pt 1): 1332-1336.
53.    Porst H, Giuliano F, Glina S, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-a-day dosing of tadalafil 5mg and 10mg in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 351-359.
54.    McMahon C. Efficacy and safety of daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction previously unresponsive to on-demand tadalafil. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 292-300. 
55.    Margo CE, French DD. Ischemic optic neuropathy in male veterans prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 538-539.
56.    Porst H. The rationale for prostaglandin E1 in erectile failure: a survey of worldwide experience. J Urol 1996; 55: 802-815.
57.    McMahon CG. Comparison of the response to the intracavernosal injection of a combination of papaverine and phentolamine, prostaglandin E1 alone and a combination of all three in the management of impotence. Int J Impotence Res 1991; 3: 133-142.
58.    McMahon CG, Samali R, Johnson H. Treatment of intracorporeal injection nonresponse with sildenafil alone or in combination with triple agent intracorporeal injection therapy. J Urol 1999; 162: 1992-1998.
59.    Trost LW, Munarriz R, Wang R, Morey A, Levine L. External mechanical devices and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1579-1617.
60.    Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol 2000; 164: 376-380.
61.    Levine LA, Becher EF, Bella AJ, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.  J Sex Med 2016; 13: 489-518.
62.    Park K, Kim SW, Rhu KS, Paick JS. Chronic administration of an oral Rho kinase inhibitor prevents the development of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction in a rat model. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 996-1003. 
63.    Gittelman M, McMahon CG, Rodríguez-Rivera JA, Beneke M, Ulbrich E, Ewald S. The POTENT II randomised trial: efficacy and safety of an orodispersible vardenafil formulation for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 594-603.
64.    Kurakula M, Ahmed OA, Fahmy UA, Ahmed TA. Solid lipid nanoparticles for transdermal delivery of avanafil: optimization, formulation, in-vitro and ex-vivo studies. J Liposome Res 2016; 26: 288-296.
65.    Chung E, Wang J. A state-of-art review of low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy and lithotripter machines for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14: 929-934.
66.    Melman A, Bar-Chama N, McCullough A, Davies K, Christ G. The first human trial for gene transfer therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: preliminary results. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 314-318.
67.    Lin CS, Xin ZC, Wang Z, et al. Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a critical review. Stem Cells Dev 2012; 21: 343-351. 
68.    Epifanova MV, Chalyi ME, Krasnov AO. [Investigation of mechanisms of action of growth factors of autologous platelet-rich plasma used to treat erectile dysfunction]. Urologiia 2017: 46-48.
69.    Atala A. Engineering of cells and tissues for treatment of erectile dysfunction. World J Urol 2001; 19: 67-73.
70.    Montorsi F, Briganti A, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Burnett AL. Current and future strategies for preventing and managing erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 123-133.
71.    Incrocci L. Sexual function after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: what do we know? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006; 57: 165-173.
72.    Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408-1410.
73.    Hong EK. Lepor H, McCullough AR. Time dependent patient satisfaction with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Int J Impot Res 1999; 11 Suppl 1: S15-S22.
74.    Padma-Nathan H, McCullough AR, Levine LA, et al; Study Group. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 479-486. 
75.    Incrocci L, Koper PC, Hop WC, Slob AK. Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) and erectile dysfunction following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 1190-1195.
76.    Schröder FH, Collette L, de Reijke TM, Whelan P. Prostate cancer treated by anti-androgens: is sexual function preserved? EORTC Genitourinary Group. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 283-290. 
77.    Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, et al. Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 110-115.
78.    Levine LA. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease with intralesional verapamil injection. J Urol 1997; 158: 1395-1399.
79.    Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJ, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of peyronie disease in 2 large double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase 3 studies. J Urol 2013; 190: 199-207.
To continue reading unlock this article
Already a subscriber?