Peer Reviewed
Feature Article Cardiovascular medicine

Acute coronary syndromes – improving outcomes in women

Alexandra Murphy, Jennifer Johns
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death around the world and represents a major threat to the health of Australian women, in whom it is under-recognised. Acute coronary syndromes often present differently in women than in men, and women may be undertreated, receiving less risk factor modification, less invasive treatment and less guideline-recommended secondary preventive medication after a cardiac event. Efforts must be made to improve the risk profile, awareness and treatment of cardiovascular disease among women in Australia.

Key Points
  • Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Australia and represents a major threat to the health of Australian women, in whom it is under-recognised.
  • Compared with men, women have a higher prevalence of certain traditional cardiac risk factors but receive less intensive risk factor modification.
  • Women have greater mortality associated with cardiovascular disease.
  • Women with acute coronary syndromes present differently to men and are often undertreated.
  • There is potential to improve awareness and treatment of cardiovascular disease among women in Australia.

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Australia and around the world. It incorporates a group of highly preventable and treatable diseases affecting the heart and blood vessels, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and peripheral vascular disease.1 These conditions represent a major threat to the health of Australian women, the extent of which is often underestimated because of a misconception that women are ‘protected’ against cardiovascular disease.2 

Compared with men, women have a higher prevalence of certain traditional risk factors, such as hypertension and diabetes, but often receive less intensive risk factor modification.3 Additionally, women present later and have greater mortality associated with their disease.4,5 There is potential to improve the risk profile, awareness and treatment of cardiovascular disease among Australian women, thereby reducing the number of women affected by these conditions.

This article focuses on the female pattern of ischaemic heart disease specific to acute coronary syndromes (ACS), broadly including takotsubo cardiomyopathy and ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), and the investigation and management considerations that are important in this population.

Presentation 

ACS is defined as any group of clinical symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischaemia. This includes unstable angina, non-ST-segment myocardial infarction and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and has traditionally been associated with obstructive coronary artery disease.6 

Acute occlusion of the coronary arteries is caused by disruption of plaque and formation of a thrombus, which subsequently limits blood flow to the myocardium.7 The pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and ACS is different in women than in men, as women are less likely to present with plaque rupture.8 

There are also significant differences in the clinical presentation of ACS between men and women. Women frequently present later and with more atypical symptoms, such as pain in the upper back and neck, fatigue, nausea and vomiting.9 These differences in symptom presentation are thought to account in part for the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of women with ACS.10

Prognosis

There is an alarming gender gap in mortality associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Women, particularly younger women (less than 55 years of age), face a worse prognosis than men when presenting with ACS.11,12 Adjustment for disease severity, comorbidity and treatment does not fully account for this gap, which may represent a sex-specific pathophysiology of ACS that remains poorly understood.

Management

The use of guideline-directed therapy after ACS is beneficial to both men and women.13 Despite overall improvements in the implementation of guideline-directed therapy, optimal medical therapy continues to be underused in women compared with men.14 

Recently published data from the Australian CONCORDANCE (Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events) registry showed that women with STEMI were less likely than men to have undergone coronary angiography, timely revascularisation or primary percutaneous coronary intervention.10 Furthermore, on discharge, women were significantly less likely to receive guideline-recommended secondary preventive medications. These discrepancies in management were seen after adjusting for confounding factors, such as age, comorbidities and baseline risk levels.10 

More work is needed to identify the persisting barriers to the equitable treatment of ACS in women.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy 

ACS can be mimicked by other conditions, such as takotsubo cardiomyopathy (Figure). This is a transient nonischaemic cardiomyopathy that is characterised by left ventricular dysfunction and is often accompanied by ECG changes and elevation in cardiac biomarker levels consistent with myocardial infarction. It is likely mediated by catecholamine excess and is usually seen in the context of acute physical or psychological stress.15

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is thought to represent up to 2% of all admissions with presumed ACS and is almost always seen in women. A large-scale US database study looking at trends of takotsubo cardiomyopathy over five years showed that women consistently represented more than 90% of presentations.16 The mechanism behind this gender difference is unclear, although oestrogen is thought to play a role in the catecholaminergic response to stress.17 

Reported outcomes in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy are generally favourable, with low in-hospital mortality and recovery of left ventricular function within weeks to months in most patients.18 Although the prognosis for takotsubo cardiomyopathy is typically very good, some patients experience a recurrence. The determinants of this are not well understood, although recurrence often occurs in patients who had severe left ventricular dysfunction at the index event and in younger female patients (aged less than 50 years).19

There are no consensus guidelines on the management of takotsubo cardiomyopathy and, as such, treatment is individualised. Long-term beta blocker therapy is often adopted, with the goal of preventing recurrence. Serial imaging with transthoracic echocardiography is warranted to exclude dangerous complications, such as left ventricular thrombus or outflow tract obstruction, and to ensure the recovery of the left ventricle.15 

Further investigation is needed to identify optimal management of this condition and to clarify the pathogenic background that results in the gender-related differences in prevalence.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of ACS that is more prominent in women than men and often affects patients under the age of 50 years who have minimal or no cardiac risk factors.20 It is caused by a tear in the wall of the coronary artery, which results in the formation of a haematoma, leading to obstruction of coronary artery blood flow to the myocardium.7

Although previously thought to be a rare condition, advancements in intravascular imaging used at the time of coronary angiography have improved awareness and diagnosis of SCAD.21 Notably, recent studies have implicated SCAD in 35% of myocardial infarctions among women aged under 50 years, and SCAD is the most common aetiology  of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction.22,23

Management of SCAD is usually conservative, and there are low rates of inhospital adverse events. Despite this, recurrent cardiovascular events are common in this group, with up to 10% of patients having another episode of SCAD. The use of beta blockers and aggressive treatment of hypertension are thought to be protective and should be considered in all patients with SCAD.24

Ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease

INOCA is prevalent among women. First described more than 40 years ago, the aetiology and pathogenesis of this phenomenon are still a source of debate. Proposed mechanistic pathways include adverse coronary reactivity, distal embolisation, concealed atherosclerosis and endothelial and microvascular dysfunction.25 

Given the array of possible underlying mechanisms, there is considerable variability in prognosis and management. The Cardiovascular Disease in Women Committee of the American College of Cardiology and other interested groups recently convened a working group to develop a consensus on the syndrome of INOCA. It found that these patients have an elevated risk of a cardiovascular event, including ACS, hospitalisation for heart failure, stroke and repeated cardiovascular procedures.26 Despite this, the lack of obstructive coronary artery disease in these patients leads to under-recognition of heart disease and thus less aggressive treatment strategies. 

There is a paucity of evidence for the treatment of this condition, and management is focussed on symptom control alone. This is in part because clinical trials of patients with ischaemic heart disease and ACS have focused on the traditional mechanism of plaque rupture and obstruction. As women are more likely to present without plaque rupture or obstruction, women with INOCA have been under-represented in these trials. 

Conclusion

Persisting differences in the investigation and management of men and women with coronary artery disease are disconcerting. Undertreatment of women with coronary artery disease has been a consistent feature of ACS management in several studies.5,9,11 This might be caused by poor awareness of their risk or by clinician bias towards undertreatment, based on a misunderstanding of the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease in women. Whatever the mechanism, this gender disparity must be addressed. Attention should be given to improving the risk profile, awareness and treatment of cardiovascular disease among Australian women, thereby reducing the number of women affected by these conditions.     MT

 

COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

 

References

1.    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Women and heart disease: cardiovascular profile of women in Australia. Cardiovascular disease series no. 33. Cat. no. CVD 49. Canberra: AIHW; 2010.
2.    Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J 2010; 18: 598-602.
3.    Wakabayashi I. Gender differences in cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease and those with type 2 diabetes.  J Thorac Dis 2017; 9: E503-E506.
4.    Park SM, Merz CNB. Women and ischemic heart disease: recognition, diagnosis and management. Korean Circ J 2016; 46: 433-442.
5.    Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2009; 302: 874-882.
6.    Kumar A, Cannon CP. Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 917-938.
7.    Shufelt CL, Pacheco C, Tweet MS, Miller VM. Sex-specific physiology and cardiovascular disease. In: Kerkhof PLM, Miller VM, eds. Sex-specific analysis of cardiovascular function. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018: p. 433-454.
8.    Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, Finn AV, Virmani R. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 719-728.
9.    Khan NA, Daskalopoulou SS, Karp I, et al. Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1863-1871.
10.    Khan E, Brieger D, Amerena J, et al. Differences in management and outcomes for men and women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Med  J Aust 2018; 209: 118-123.
11.    Chandrasekhar J, Baber U, Sartori S, et al. Sex-related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the PROMETHEUS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 89: 629-637.
12.    Merz CN, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, et al. The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: protocol design, methodology and feasibility report.  J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1453-1461.
13.    Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.  N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1503-1516.
14.    Novack V, Cutlip DE, Jotkowitz A, Lieberman N, Porath A. Reduction in  sex-based mortality difference with implementation of new cardiology guidelines. Am J Med 2008; 121: 597-603.e1.
15.    Veillet-Chowdhury M, Hassan SF, Stergiopoulos K. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a review. Acute Card Care 2014; 16: 15-22.
16.    Khera R, Light-McGroary K, Zahr F, Horwitz PA, Girotra S. Trends in hospitalization for takotsubo cardiomyopathy in the United States. Am Heart  J 2016; 172: 53-63.
17.    Schneider B, Athanasiadis A, Sechtem U. Gender-related differences in takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail Clin 2013; 9: 137-146, vii.
18.    Murugiah K, Wang Y, Desai NR, et al. Trends in short- and long-term outcomes for takotsubo cardiomyopathy among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2007 to 2012. JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4: 197-205.
19.    Sager HB, Schunkert H, Kurowski V. Recurrent mid-ventricular tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy: three episodes of a uniform cardiac response to varying stressors. Int J Cardiol 2011; 152: e22-e24.
20.    Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation 2012; 126: 579-588.
21.    Rogowski S, Maeder MT, Weilenmann D, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic follow-up and long-term clinical outcome in a predominantly medically treated population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 89: 59-68.
22.    Nakashima T, Noguchi T, Haruta S, et al. Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Angina Pectoris-Myocardial Infarction Multicenter Investigators in Japan. Int J Cardiol 2016; 207: 341-348.
23.    Elkayam U. Clinical characteristics of peripartum cardiomyopathy in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 659-670.
24.    Saw J, Humphries K, Aymong E, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 1148-1158.
25.    Beltrame JF, Pasupathy S, Tavella R, White HD. How can you have a myocardial infarction without significant coronary artery disease? Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 649-651.
26.    Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation 2017; 135: 1075-1092.
To continue reading unlock this article
Already a subscriber?