Peer Reviewed
Feature Article Cardiovascular medicine
CPD
Complete 1.5 CPD hours

Atrial fibrillation management. The central role of the GP

David Brieger, Cia Connell, Charlotte Hespe, Nicholas Zwar
Abstract

Opportunistic annual screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) is strongly recommended in those aged 65 years and over and is easily accomplished. Integrated care to support comprehensive treatment and address the specific needs of people with AF is required, and GPs are central to its effective delivery.
Update
An updated version of Table 2 in this article is available here.

Key Points
  • Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the clinic or community is recommended for all patients aged over 65 years.
  • Deciding between a rate and rhythm control strategy at the time of diagnosis of AF and periodically thereafter is important.
  • Beta-blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists (e.g. diltiazem, verapamil) remain the first-line choice for acute and chronic rate control.
  • When pharmacologic rhythm control is the selected strategy, flecainide is preferable to amiodarone for both acute and chronic rhythm control provided left ventricular function is normal and patient does not have coronary disease.
  • Failure of rate or rhythm control should prompt consideration of percutaneous or surgical ablation.
  • The sexless CHA2DS2-VA assessment, which standardises thresholds across men and women, is recommended to assess stroke risk.
  • Anticoagulation is recommended for a CHA2DS2-VA score of 2 or more.
  • When anticoagulation is indicated, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended in preference to warfarin.
  • Net clinical benefit almost always favours stroke prevention over major bleeding, so bleeding risk scores should not be used to avoid anticoagulation in patients with AF.
  • An integrated care approach using patient education and available e-health tools and resources should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team.
  • Regular monitoring and feedback of risk-factor control helps to ensure treatment adherence and persistence.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common recurrent arrhythmia faced in clinical practice, and it causes substantial morbidity and mortality.1-3 In Australia, prevalent AF cases in people aged 55 years or more are projected to double over the next two decades as a result of an ageing population and improved survival from contributory diseases.4 Recent Australian data show that hospitalisations of patients with AF increased 295% over a 21-year period – a higher increase than for myocardial infarction or heart failure over the same period.5

In many patients, AF progresses from short paroxysmal episodes to more frequent and persistent attacks, and then often to permanent AF. However, progression can be mitigated by aggressive targeting of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.6

AF is independently associated with an increased long-term risk of stroke, heart failure and all-cause death.1-3 The risk of dying from stroke can be reduced by administration of oral anticoagulants (OACs), but all-cause mortality and deaths from complications such as heart failure remain high, despite guideline-adherent treatment.1,7 This highlights the need for a comprehensive care approach to reduce overall mortality in AF-affected patients.8

The National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand recently produced guidelines on the diagnosis and management of AF.9 These are intended to be used by practising clinicians across all disciplines caring for such patients. This review covers the sections of the guidelines that are particularly relevant to GPs.

What defines atrial fibrillation?

The diagnosis of AF requires rhythm ­documentation using an ECG. If AF is present, there are irregular RR intervals and no discernible P waves. By accepted convention, an episode lasting at least 30 seconds is diagnostic. Nonvalvular AF (NVAF) refers to AF in the absence of moderate to severe mitral stenosis or a mechanical heart valve.10

Screening for atrial fibrillation

There is strong epidemiological evidence that previously unknown AF is associated with about 10% of all ischaemic strokes.11,12 Evidence from systematic reviews indicates that 1.4% of patients in community or practice situations aged 65 years or over will have unknown asymptomatic AF on single time-point screening of pulse ECG.13

Opportunistic annual screening for AF in general practice in patients aged 65 years or over is strongly recommended, and is easily accomplished by pulse palpation followed by an ECG (if irregular), or by an ECG rhythm strip using a handheld ECG. This screening can be incorporated into standard consultations or undertaken by practice nurses during chronic care consultations or immunisations. Devices that provide a medical quality ECG trace are preferred to pulse-taking or pulse-based devices for screening, because an ECG is required to confirm the diagnosis.

Newer devices such as the Apple watch are able to detect AF, but there is limited published evidence to date to justify ­routine screening with these devices. Patients presenting to the GP with arrhythmia detected on an Apple watch should have a 12-lead ECG to confirm the diagnosis.

Diagnostic work up

A 12-lead ECG not only establishes the diagnosis of AF, it also provides evidence of conduction defects, ischaemia and signs of structural heart disease. A diagnostic work up should also include serum electrolyte levels, as abnormal concentrations may result in muscle contraction disorders, other cardiac arrhythmias and drug interactions.

Symptomatic thyroid disease appears to be rare in people presenting with AF, and yield of testing is low.14 Making a ­diagnosis of overt thyroid disease is also complicated by the fact that any acute illness affects ­thyroid indices;15 hence, this screening should be reserved for stable ­out­patients, highlighting the important role of the GP.

A transthoracic echocardiogram can help in patient management by identifying valvular heart disease, quantifying left ventricular (LV) function and atrial size, and should be performed in all patients with newly diagnosed AF.

Detection and management of risk factors and concomitant diseases

Cardiovascular risk factors are recognised contributors to the development of AF.16 Several of these risk factors are well established; they include hypertension, diabetes mellitus and alcohol excess. In addition, several cardiovascular conditions are associated with the development of AF, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, valvular disease and sinus node disease.

With the burden of AF increasing at rates greater than those predicted by known risk factors, there has been interest in several newer risk factors, including obesity, sleep apnoea, physical inactivity and prehypertension.17-22

The more risk factors that an individual has, the greater the likelihood that a person will develop AF and more persistent AF.23,24 Traditional cardiovascular risk factors are also an important determinant of recurrence of AF when using a rhythm-control strategy.25-30

Treating underlying risk factors has been observed to reduce incident AF and the risk of complications associated with AF; hence, their management is an important part of managing patients with AF.31,32

Recent Australian studies have shown that physician-led intervention of risk factor management in overweight and obese patients led to a marked reduction in AF symptoms, episode frequency and duration.33 The response is graded – the greater the impact on the risk factor, the more likely that sinus rhythm will be maintained.34,35

Arrhythmia management

Rate vs rhythm control

In all patients with new onset AF, a decision regarding rate versus rhythm control is required (Box). A rate-control strategy may be used in preference to rhythm control in patients with minimal symptoms or in those in whom attempts at maintaining sinus rhythm are likely to be futile. Patients who have not responded to a rhythm-control strategy may be managed with rate control.

Strategies for rate control

First-line options for rate control are ­beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and non­dihydropyridine calcium channel anta­gonists (diltiazem or verapamil), alone or in combination (Flowchart 1).36 Digoxin continues to have a role as a second-line agent, but there are risks of toxicity. Amiodarone should be considered a last-line option, given its toxicity profile. Membrane-active rhythm-control agents (e.g. flecainide or sotalol) should not be used as part of a rate control strategy.

Strategies for rhythm control

Patients with haemodynamic instability require urgent electrical cardioversion. In stable patients, acute rhythm rather than rate control can be considered if symptoms are unacceptable, or in patients experiencing their first episode of AF. There is a high spontaneous reversion rate to sinus rhythm for new onset AF within 48 hours, so although pharmacological cardioversion can be considered, a ‘wait and watch’ approach with rate control may be reasonable in a mildly symptomatic patient.

Once patients have reverted, the choice of long-term antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy depends on the patient’s comorbidities and preferences. Options include flecainide, amiodarone or sotalol, generally informed by cardiologist advice. For further information see the full guidelines at www.heartfoundation.org.au/for-­professionals/clinical-information/atrial-fibrillation.37 Adjunctive lifestyle modification and strict cardiovascular risk-factor control should not be overlooked in rhythm-control management of AF.33,34

AF ablation is an effective procedure for appropriately selected patients with symptomatic AF. It is applicable to patients who have failed or are intolerant to AADs, or for some patients who decline AAD treatment. Multiple randomised controlled trials have demonstrated higher rates of sinus rhythm maintenance compared with AADs.38 Although the evidence is strongest for percutaneous treatment, surgical ablation may also be offered under certain circumstances.

Stroke prevention

Prediction of stroke risk and use of anticoagulation therapy

The Australian guidelines recommend using a CHA2DS2-VA score to assess stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular AF (Table 1). This is recommended in preference to the CHA2DS2-VASc score as it provides one consistent anticoagulation threshold recommendation for both sexes. The female sex category (Sc) is no longer required as it adds little predictive value in the absence of additional risk factors.39-41

Stroke risk factors may change over time because of ageing or development of new comorbidities. Hence, annual review of low-risk patients is recommended to ensure that risk is adequately characterised to guide OAC therapy.

For a CHA2DS2-VA score of 2 or more, the benefits of reduced stroke and reduced mortality from anticoagulation certainly outweigh the risk of major haemorrhage, and treatment with an OAC is recommended. At a CHA2DS2-VA score of 1, the risk-benefit equation is more balanced, so other factors require greater con­sideration in the decision on anticoagulation. Oral anticoagulation therapy to prevent thromboembolism and systemic embolism is not recommended in patients with NVAF whose CHA2DS2-VA score is 0 (Flowchart 2).

Anticoagulation with warfarin reduces the risk of embolic stroke by 64% and of mortality by 26% when used in patients with NVAF.42 However, warfarin is difficult to use in clinical practice because of ­multiple food and drug interactions, and the need for frequent monitoring to keep the ­anti­coagulation within the therapeutic range.43,44 As with all forms of antithrombotic or anticoagulant therapy, bleeding is increased with warfarin, but the rate of intracranial haemorrhage is higher ­compared with other agents.45-47 Therefore, when oral anticoagulation is initiated in a patient with NVAF, a nonvitamin K oral anti­coagulant (NOAC) – apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban – is recommended in preference to warfarin. There is no role for NOACs in patients with valvular AF (mechanical heart valves or moderate to severe mitral stenosis) and ­warfarin remains the recommended treatment option.

The evidence for stroke prevention with aspirin is weak and aspirin is a­ssociated with a risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.45,48 Aspirin together with clopidogrel was 44% less effective than warfarin in stroke prevention, with comparable ­incidence of major bleeding.49 Antiplatelet therapy is therefore not recommended for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF, regardless of stroke risk.

Minimisation of bleeding risk

The risk of bleeding with warfarin is 1.3% per year in patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0, and NOACs have either a comparable or a slightly reduced major bleeding risk ­relative to warfarin.50,51 Bleeding risk can be estimated by a variety of clinical scores, although the predictive power for all of them is modest. The net clinical benefit almost always favours stroke prevention over major bleeding, so bleeding risk scores should not be used to avoid anticoagulation in patients with AF. Higher scores might be used to alert the clinician to a greater need to attend to any modifiable bleeding risk factors.

Modifiable bleeding risk factors include hypertension, falls and peptic ulceration. The risk associated with ­recurrent falls may be reduced by falls prevention programs. In people with recurrent falls despite efforts to decrease risk of falling, a more detailed discussion may need to be had on the risks associated with continuing anticoagulation versus the risks associated with stopping anticoagulation.

Most significant bleeds occur from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Causes of previous upper GIT bleeding in this context, such as peptic ulceration, are usually preventable and are not a contraindication.52 Untreatable or difficult-to-prevent causes of lower GIT bleeding (e.g. recurrent ­bleeding from angiodysplasia) may be a contraindication to anticoagulation.

Major bleeding can be reduced through high-quality INR control with warfarin therapy, and appropriate selection of NOAC dosage according to age and renal function (Table 2).52-54

Combining anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents

Recent guidelines based predominantly on consensus opinion have supported the use of combined anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who require OAC for stroke prevention, and DAPT following acute coronary syndrome or stent implantation, or both. Discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy should be considered 12 months after stent implantation, acute coronary syndrome or both, with continuation of OAC alone. The selection of therapy is complex and typically based on advice from a cardiologist. For further information see the full guideline.37

Stroke prevention with left atrial appendage occlusion

Percutaneous or surgical left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF at moderate to high risk of stroke and with contraindications to oral ­anticoagulation therapy.

Medication adherence and persistence with atrial fibrillation pharmacotherapy

One of the most sobering statistics regarding AF is that about one-third to half of patients discontinue therapy within two to two-and-a-half years of initiation.55,56 For this reason, a major role for the GP is regular monitoring and ­sup­port of patient treatment adherence and persistence.

Among the broader non-AF literature, meta-analyses have shown that medication adherence interventions can lead to significant, albeit modest, improvements in patient-centred outcomes. Unfortunately, the most effective interventions are usually complex (comprising tailored ongoing support, cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational interviewing, ­education or daily treatment support; which are delivered face-to-face, often via pharmacists) and may be difficult to implement in real-world practice.

Resources for GPs

Existing resources are available to support GPs in providing integrated care, including:

  • access to multidisciplinary expertise (e.g. allied health services, nurse practitioners, accredited pharmacists) via Medicare-funded care plan referrals, multidisciplinary case conferences, medication management reviews, and health assessments for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and older people
  • initiatives to support the adoption of ehealth in general practice (e.g. the Medicare-funded Practice Incentives Program eHealth incentive).
  • training resources to support health professionals in effectively and efficiently improving medication adherence.57 A range of additional Australian resources may be obtained from the Heart Foundation, the National Stroke Foundation, and the National Prescribing Service (NPS) MedicineWise.

Conclusion

The rapidly increasing prevalence of AF has placed a significant burden on healthcare use in Australia, challenging the delivery of health services and resulting in care that is consequently more fragmented. There is a clear need for more integrated care to support the comprehensive treatment required, and to address the specific needs of people with AF. Given the high population prevalence of AF and that it most often occurs in the context of multimorbidity, there is a need for GPs to have a major role in the care of patients with AF.     MT

 

COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

 

References

1.    Andersson T, Magnuson A, Bryngelsson IL, et al. All-cause mortality in 272 186 patients hospitalized with incident atrial fibrillation 1995–2008: a Swedish nationwide long-term case–control study. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1061-1067.
2.    Ball J, Carrington MJ, McMurray MJ, Stewart S. Atrial fibrillation: profile and burden of an evolving epidemic in the 21st century. Int J Cardiol 2013. 167: 1807-1824.
3.    Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, et al. Fifty-year trends in atrial fibrillation: prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386: 154-162.
4.    Ball J, Thompson DR, Ski CF, Carrington MJ, Gerber T, Stewart S. Estimating the current and future prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Australian adult population. Med J Aust 2015; 202: 32-35.
5.    Gallagher C, Hendriks JM, Giles L, et al. Increasing trends in hospitalisations due to atrial fibrillation in Australia from 1993 to 2013. Heart 2019; 105: 1358-1363.
6.    Mahajan R, Pathak RK, Thiyagarajah A, et al. Risk factor management and atrial fibrillation clinics: saving the best for last? Heart Lung Circ 2017; 26: 990-997.
7.    Briffa T, Hung J, Knuiman M, et al. Trends in incidence and prevalence of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation and associated mortality in Western Australia, 1995–2010. Int J Cardiol 2016; 208: 19-25.
8.    Gallagher C, Elliott AD, Wong CX, et al. Integrated care in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2017; 103: 1947-1953.
9.    Brieger D, Amerena J, Attia JR, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation 2018. Med J Aust 2018; 209: 356-362.
10.    Fauchier L, Philippart R, Clementy N, et al. How to define valvular atrial fibrillation? Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2015; 108: 530-539.
11.    Freedman B, Potpara TS, Lip GY. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Lancet 2016; 388: 806-817.
12.    Freedman B, Camm J, Calkins H, et al; AF-Screen Collaborators. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration. Circulation 2017; 135: 1851-1867.
13.    Lowres N, Neubeck L, Redfern J, Freedman SB. Screening to identify unknown atrial fibrillation. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 213-222.
14.    Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Kerr CR, et al. How useful is thyroid function testing in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation? The Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2221-2224.
15.    Attia J, Margetts P, Guyatt G. Diagnosis of thyroid disease in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 658-665.
16.    Lau DH, Nattel S, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Modifiable risk factors and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2017; 136: 583-596.
17.    Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006; 114: 119-125.
18.    Gami AS, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 565-571.
19.    Tedrow UB, Conen D, Ridker PM, et al. The long- and short-term impact of elevated body mass index on the risk of new atrial fibrillation the WHS (women’s health study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2319-2327.
20.    Lau DH, Middeldorp ME, Brooks AG, et al. Aortic stiffness in lone atrial fibrillation: a novel risk factor for arrhythmia recurrence. PLoS One 2013; 8: e76776.
21.    Mozaffarian D, Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Siscovick D. Physical activity and incidence of atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Circulation 2008; 118: 800-807.
22.    Huxley RR, Misialek JR, Agarwal SK, et al. Physical activity, obesity, weight change, and risk of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 620-625.
23.    Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, Goette A. Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev 2011; 91: 265-325.
24.    Chamberlain AM, Agarwal SK, Folsom AR, et al. A clinical risk score for atrial fibrillation in a biracial prospective cohort (from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ARIC] study). Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 85-91.
25.    Shah AN, Mittal S, Sichrovsky TC, et al. Long-term outcome following successful pulmonary vein isolation: pattern and prediction of very late recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008; 19: 661-667.
26.    Sawhney N, Anousheh R, Chen WC, Narayan S, Feld GK. Five-year outcomes after segmental pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 366-372.
27.    Fein AS, Shvilkin A, Shah D, et al. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 300-305.
28.    Naruse Y, Tada H, Satoh M, et al. Concomitant obstructive sleep apnea increases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: clinical impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 331-337.
29.    Wong CX, Sullivan T, Sun MT, et al. Obesity and risk of incident, post-operative and post-ablation atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of 626,603 individuals in 51 studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2015; 1: 139-152.
30.    Sivasambu B, Balouch MA, Zghaib T, et al. Increased rates of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation in overweight and obese patients. J Cardiovasc J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018; 29: 239-245.
31.    Schneider MP, Hua TA, Bohm M, Wachtell K, Kjeldsen SE, Schmieder RE. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by renin-angiotensin system inhibition a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2299-2307.
32.    Healey JS, Baranchuk A, Crystal E, et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1832-1839.
33.    Abed HS, Wittert GA, Leong DP, et al. Effect of weight reduction and cardiometabolic risk factor management on symptom burden and severity in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 2050-2060.
34.    Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Meredith M, et al. Long-term effect of goal-directed weight management in an atrial fibrillation cohort: a long-term follow-up study (LEGACY). J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 2159-2169.
35.    Pathak RK, Elliott A, Middeldorp ME, et al. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on arrhythmia recurrence in obese individuals with atrial fibrillation: The CARDIO-FIT study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 985-996.
36.    Segal JB, McNamara RL, Miller MR, et al. The evidence regarding the drugs used for ventricular rate control. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 47-59.
37.    Brieger D, Amerena J, Attia J, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation 2018. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 1209-1266. Available online at: www.heartfoundation.org.au/for-professionals/clinical-information/atrial-fibrillation (accessed November 2019).
38.    Kalla M, Sanders P, Kalman JM, Lee G. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: approaches and outcomes. Heart Lung Circ 2017; 26: 941-949.
39.    Allan V, Banerjee A, Shah AD, et al. Net clinical benefit of warfarin in individuals with atrial fibrillation across stroke risk and across primary and secondary care. Heart 2017; 103: 210-218.
40.    Andersson T, Magnuson A, Bryngelsson IL, et al. Patients with atrial fibrillation and outcomes of cerebral infarction in those with treatment of warfarin versus no warfarin with references to CHA2DS2-VASc score, age and sex - a Swedish nationwide observational study with 48 433 patients. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0176846.
41.    Fauchier L, Lecoq C, Clementy N, et al. Oral anticoagulation and the risk of stroke or death in patients with atrial fibrillation and one additional stroke risk factor: the Loire Valley atrial fibrillation project. Chest 2016; 149: 960-968.
42.    Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857-867.
43.    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2014; 130: 2071-2104.
44.    National Clinical Guideline Centre, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Atrial fibrillation: the management of atrial fibrillation. Clinical guideline [CG180]. London: NICE; 2014.
45.    Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus aspirin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 590-592.
46.    Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001; 285: 2864-2870.
47.    Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1406-1412.
48.    Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet 1994; 343: 687-691.
49.    Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Hart RG, et al. Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2066-2078.
50.    De Caterina R, Husted S, Wallentin L, et al. Anticoagulants in heart disease: current status and perspectives. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 880-913.
51.    Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 955-962.
52.    Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 238-244.
53.    Hylek EM, Go AS, Chang Y, et al. Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1019-1026.
54.    Lai KC, Chu KM, Hui WM, et al. Esomeprazole with aspirin versus clopidogrel for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 860-865.
55.    Simons LA, Ortiz M, Freedman B, Waterhouse BJ, Colquhoun D. Medium- to long-term persistence with non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: Australian experience. Curr Med Res Opin 2017; 33: 1337-1341.
56.    Abdou JK, Auyeung V, Patel JP, Arva R. Adherence to long-term anticoagulation treatment, what is known and what the future might hold. Br J Haematol 2016; 174: 30-42.
57.    National Heart Foundation of Australia, Aslani P, Krass I, Bajorek B, Thistlewaite J, Tofler G on behalf of the Heart Foundation Pharmaceutical Roundtable. Improving adherence in cardiovascular care. A toolkit for health professionals. NHFA; 2011.
To continue reading unlock this article
Already a subscriber?