Peer Reviewed
Feature Article Endocrinology and metabolism

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Ross Apostolov, Josephine A. Grace
Abstract

Disease progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) occurs more commonly in patients with other features of the metabolic syndrome. Primary care physicians play an important role in diagnosing NAFLD, managing metabolic risk factors and noninvasive assessment of disease stage.

Key Points
  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects about a quarter of Australia’s population.
  • NAFLD encompasses a broad spectrum of clinical disease ranging from benign simple steatosis to end-stage cirrhosis.
  • Patients with the metabolic syndrome are more likely to have NAFLD and more likely to have progressive liver disease from NAFLD.
  • A noninvasive assessment for fibrosis and cirrhosis should be performed in patients with NAFLD.
  • All patients with NAFLD should be counselled about the importance of weight loss and exercise.
  • There is currently no approved, disease-modifying therapy for NAFLD and patients who have significant liver disease due to NAFLD should be referred to a gastroenterologist for assessment and consideration of participation in a clinical drug trial.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a spectrum of clinical disease ranging from benign fat accumulation in the liver (simple steatosis) to severe nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) causing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD is the most common cause of deranged liver function test results in Australia, and a recent study has found that its clinical significance is often underappreciated.1 This article provides practical information for primary care givers on the management of patients with NAFLD and its metabolic disease associations.

What is NAFLD?

NAFLD is defined as the presence of fat in the liver (known as steatosis) in the absence of a secondary cause such as excessive alcohol intake (>20 g daily for women and >30 g daily for men).2 Patients with NAFLD are asymptomatic until late stages of the disease and the diagnosis is often made incidentally. The requirements for diagnosis of NAFLD are summarised in Box 1.

Liver function test results do not have to be abnormal to make a diagnosis of NAFLD; however, mild to moderate elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels are common among people with NAFLD in the absence of symptoms. A diagnosis of NAFLD should be suspected in patients who have any of the following:

  • elevated liver enzymes (ALT/AST >30 IU/L or GGT >60 IU/L)
  • steatosis on ultrasound or CT imaging
  • two or more of the comorbidities from the metabolic syndrome.

In a patient with suspected NAFLD, clinicians should exclude other aetiologies of steatosis or elevated liver enzymes and try to establish whether the patient has fibrosis or cirrhosis.

How common is NAFLD?

There are no published Australian data on the prevalence of NAFLD in adults, although its prevalence is estimated to be 25% from a study of its global burden.3 The current burden of NAFLD in Australia is estimated to be 5.5 million cases, and is predicted to increase to 7 million by 2030.4 Although NAFLD is more common among elderly patients, an Australian study found its prevalence to be 15% among a cohort of adolescents.5,6 A total of 21% of this cohort had a body mass index in the obese range.

The natural history of NAFLD

The clinical spectrum of NAFLD ranges from benign, nonprogressive steatosis to end-stage cirrhosis with liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. The three main stages of NAFLD and their risks of progression to end-stage liver disease are shown in Box 2. A range of clinical and biochemical features can suggest the most likely NAFLD stage in an individual patient.

The progression of NAFLD to NASH was previously shown to occur in about 10 to 30% of patients;7,8 however, more recent data suggest that the true rate of progression may be higher, with one study showing that nearly half of patients with biopsy-proven simple steatosis progressed to NASH over an average 6.6-year period.6 The Figure illustrates the progression of NAFLD to NASH and cirrhosis.9 Reversal of liver injury back to NAFL can be achieved in patients with established NASH. The progression of NAFLD to cirrhosis is estimated to occur in up to 20 to 30% of patients, with higher rates of progression reported in studies with longer follow-up periods. Patients with NAFLD who have diabetes or obesity or who consume alcohol heavily are at increased risk of disease progression.10

Previous data regarding NAFLD and mortality have been conflicting. The largest meta-analysis to date showed patients with NAFLD had increased all-cause mortality compared with those without NAFLD, and most deaths occurred due to cardiovascular disease.11

NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is diagnosed in patients with at least three of the following five abnormalities: hypertension, elevated triglyceride level, low HDL cholesterol level, elevated fasting blood glucose level and central obesity.12 NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome are closely linked. The epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD is altered in patients with comorbidities from the metabolic syndrome. Further, patients with moderate to severe NAFLD are more likely to have the metabolic syndrome than the general population, with one study showing 18% of patients with NAFLD also had the metabolic syndrome.13 Therefore, NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome are bidirectionally linked and patients with one of these diagnoses should be regularly screened for the other.

NAFLD and type 2 diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes are about twice as likely to have concurrent NAFLD as people who do not have type 2 diabetes. A recent study showed a 56% prevalence of NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes.14 Rates of progression of NAFLD to NASH with advanced fibrosis are also higher in patients with type 2 diabetes.

NAFLD and obesity

The rising prevalence of NAFLD is associated with the obesity epidemic. The prevalence of NAFLD increases significantly with worsening obesity, and NAFLD is seen in up to 90% of patients who undergo bariatric surgery.15 Obesity appears to increase both all-cause and liver-specific mortality among patients with NAFLD.16

Differential diagnosis

NAFLD is the most common cause of mildly elevated ALT, AST and GGT levels among asymptomatic people in Australia, but primary care physicians play an important role in excluding relevant differential diagnoses. An accurate alcohol history is essential before a diagnosis of NAFLD can be considered. A complete drug history including complementary and alternative medicines should be taken.

We recommend testing all patients with suspected NAFLD for chronic hepatitis B and C infections, haemochromatosis and autoimmune liver diseases. Screening for other, rarer, causes of abnormal liver function test results such as Wilson’s disease or alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency can be guided by the history, particularly by the family history. A summary of relevant investigations can be found in Table 1.

Chronic viral hepatitis

The most commonly missed alternative diagnosis causing mildly to moderately elevated liver function test results is chronic viral hepatitis (hepatitis B or C infection). Hepatitis B infection should be suspected in all patients in remote Aboriginal communities and those born in countries outside Australia where hepatitis B infection is common, such as Asia or Africa. Hepatitis C infection should be suspected in patients who use intravenous drugs or have a past history of intravenous drug use, have undergone a transfusion with blood products before the introduction of hepatitis C screening in 1990, have tattoos or piercings done in nonsterile conditions, as well as those who may have undergone nonsterile medical or dental procedures in countries where hepatitis C is more common.

Iron overload

Genetic haemochromatosis is an important, treatable differential diagnosis in asymptomatic patients with abnormal liver function test results. Presentation with other features of this condition such as diabetes, skin pigmentation or arthritis can increase clinical suspicion. However, patients with NAFLD commonly have hyperferritinaemia in the absence of haemochromatosis, and transferrin saturation levels greater than 45% can help to determine which patients need to have haemochromatosis genotyping performed.

Assessment of fibrosis and cirrhosis in NAFLD

Once a diagnosis of NAFLD is made, it is crucial to assess the fibrosis stage, as patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis require screening for hepatocellular carcinoma and referral to a gastroenterologist. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for determining fibrosis stage but is invasive and not practical to perform in most patients with NAFLD. Well-validated methods can be used by the primary care physician to assess for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis noninvasively, as outlined below.

Noninvasive fibrosis and cirrhosis assessment

Fibrosis and cirrhosis can be noninvasively assessed for in patients with NAFLD through clinical examination, blood results and imaging of the liver. These results can be used in a number of well-validated scoring systems to differentiate those patients at low risk of liver fibrosis who can be safely managed in the community from those with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who need to be referred for further assessment.

Examination

Patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis may have several clinical signs that can be elicited at the bedside, although the absence of such signs does not reliably exclude cirrhosis. Common clinical signs and their interpretation are summarised in Table 2.

Noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems

Elevated levels of ALT, AST and GGT are common in patients with and without fibrosis or cirrhosis. No single blood test can assess fibrosis. However, numerous noninvasive scoring systems using bedside and blood tests can be used to assess for the presence of advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. We recommend the use of either the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) or the AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) as these scores utilise commonly available variables and can be easily calculated with online calculators. Many patients fall into the ‘indeterminate’ range of one or both of these scores, and transient elastography can be used to stratify risk.

The NFS was designed and validated for noninvasive fibrosis assessment specifically in NAFLD patients. This score takes into account age, hyperglycaemia, body mass index, platelet count, albumin level and AST/ALT ratio. It can be calculated online at https://nafldscore.com. A score less than -1.455 excludes advanced fibrosis (F3 or F4) and a score greater than 0.676 suggests advanced fibrosis with high accuracy.17

As liver fibrosis progresses to cirrhosis, the platelet count falls owing to portal hypertension and the resulting splenic sequestration of platelets. Hence, the APRI can be used to predict the likelihood of fibrosis or cirrhosis. This is calculated easily by dividing the AST level (as a proportion of the upper limit of normal) by the platelet count (see https://www.hepatitisc.uw.edu/page/clinical-calculators/apri). The closer the APRI is to zero, the less likely it is that a patient has significant fibrosis. The higher the APRI is above 1, the more likely it is that a patient has established cirrhosis.

Transient elastography (Fibroscan)

Transient elastography, or Fibroscan, is an ultrasound-based technology now widely available in Australia. Fibroscan measures patients’ liver stiffness in kPA and provides an estimate of fibrosis, with higher values indicating more advanced fibrosis. Fibroscan readings have been validated against liver biopsy as a measure of fibrosis in NAFLD populations.18 Accurate assessment of fibrosis in primary care can be challenging, and we recommend that all patients with NAFLD undergo transient elastography for fibrosis assessment when the results would change management. Fibroscan readings may not be valid in morbidly obese patients and are not accurate when the standard deviation and interquartile range on the report are high.

Ultrasonography of the liver is useful to detect steatosis but is unreliable in determining the presence of cirrhosis. A coarse and heterogenous appearance of the liver due to fatty infiltration can be difficult to distinguish from architectural change due to cirrhosis. Ultrasound features that are more specific to cirrhosis or portal hypertension are summarised in Box 3. Any patients found to have these features should be referred to a gastroenterologist for further assessment.

Management of patients  with NAFLD

An optimal, disease-modifying therapeutic agent for NAFLD would both reduce the level of steatohepatitis and prevent progression of or improve fibrosis. There is currently no approved, disease-modifying therapy for NAFLD. Multiple medications including statins and oral hypoglycaemic agents have been trialled for the treatment of NAFLD. These medications do not specifically improve patients’ NAFLD. However, as comorbidities from the metabolic syndrome worsen NAFLD, we recommend aggressive treatment of comorbidities.

Patients with cirrhosis from NAFLD should be managed in conjunction with a gastroenterologist. We discuss treatments that are of benefit in NAFLD patients below.

Weight loss

All patients with NAFLD and obesity should be counselled regarding weight loss. Numerous randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of weight loss on NAFLD have consistently shown clinically significant improvements in noninvasive biomarkers of disease severity but have not shown improvement in histological fibrosis.19 The benefits of weight loss for NAFLD appear after 5 to 10% of body weight loss is achieved. Weight loss through bariatric surgery reverses NAFLD in around two-thirds of patients, although it is not indicated for NAFLD alone.17

Exercise

Exercise therapy has been shown in numerous studies to improve noninvasive biomarkers of NAFLD and conditions related to the metabolic syndrome.20 Regular aerobic exercise of at least moderate intensity is ideal; however, the choice of exercise regimen should be tailored to individual patients based on their preference and physiological reserve.

Diet and lifestyle measures

Patients with NAFLD should be counselled to eat a balanced diet consisting of low glycaemic-index foods and food low in saturated fats. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a ‘best diet’ for patients with NAFLD, although the Mediterranean diet has shown promise in cross-sectional studies.21 It is unknown whether moderate alcohol consumption worsens NAFLD disease progression, but patients with NAFLD should be advised to avoid excessive alcohol consumption. There is evidence of decreased NAFLD risk in coffee drinkers, although there is insufficient evidence to recommend coffee consumption for the prevention of NAFLD.22

Diabetes and lipid management 

We recommend aggressive diabetes and lipid management in patients with NAFLD. Most medications that are currently used for both type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia treatment have also been studied specifically in patients with NAFLD. These studies have reported improvements in liver biochemistry and steatosis, but no change in fibrosis.23 At present these medications should not be used specifically for NAFLD disease modification, but only if indicated as therapy for comorbid diabetes or dyslipidaemia.

Pharmacotherapy

A promising medication for NAFLD-treatment is obeticholic acid, which is a farnesoid X receptor agonist. A recent interim analysis of a phase 3 study showed histological improvement of NAFLD in patients treated with obeticholic acid compared to placebo.24 Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials are actively recruiting patients with NAFLD. Recruitment is generally limited to patients with elevated liver enzymes and evidence of fibrosis or well-compensated cirrhosis.

When to refer to a gastroenterologist

All patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis should be managed in conjunction with a gastroenterologist. We recommend referral to a gastroenterologist for all patients with NAFLD in whom fibrosis is suspected. A suggested approach to determining location of care is presented in the Flowchart. All patients with NAFLD who are reviewed in tertiary hospital liver clinics are considered for recruitment in NAFLD clinical trials, and patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis are regularly reviewed for complications of their disease.

Conclusion

NAFLD encompasses a wide spectrum of clinical disease and is highly prevalent and under-recognised in Australia. Disease progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis occurs more commonly in patients with other features of the metabolic syndrome, and management of these risk factors forms the mainstay of treatment for NAFLD. For patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes, noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis is an important aspect of management that identifies patients who require referral to specialist care and those who should be screened for hepatocellular carcinoma.     MT

 

COMPETING INTERESTS: None

 

References

1.    Patel PJ, Banh X, Horsfall LU, et al. Underappreciation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by primary care clinicians: limited awareness of surrogate markers of fibrosis. Intern Med J 2017; 48: 144-151.
2.    Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018; 67: 328-357.
3.    Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016; 64: 73-84.
4.    Adams LA, Roberts SK, Strasser SI, et al. NAFLD disease burden - Australia, 2019-2030. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35: 1628-1635.
5.    Ayonrinde OT, Olynyk JK, Marsh JA, et al. Childhood adiposity trajectories and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescents. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 30: 163-171.
6.    McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol 2015; 62: 1148-1155.
7.    Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 2010; 140: 124-131.
8.    Matteoni C, Younossi Z, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu Y, Mccullough A. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 1413-1419.
9.    Moore JB. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the hepatic consequence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Proc Nutrition Soc 2010; 69: 211-220.
10.    Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, et al. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 550-556.
11.    Liu Y, Zhong G-C, Tan H-Y, Hao F-B, Hu J-J. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 11124.
12.    Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009; 120: 1640-1645.
13.    Yang KC, Hung H-F, Lu C-W, Chang H-H, Lee L-T, Huang K-C. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with metabolic syndrome independently of central obesity and insulin resistance. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 27034.
14.    Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2019; 71: 793-801.
15.    Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease – a global public health perspective. J Hepatol 2019; 70: 531-544.
16.    Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism Clin Exp 2018; 92: 82-97.
17.    Lee Y, Doumouras AG, Yu J, et al. Complete resolution of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 1040-1060.e11.
18.    Eddowes PJ, Sasso M, Allison M, et al. Accuracy of FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1717-1730.
19.    Koutoukidis DA, Astbury NM, Tudor KE, et al. Association of weight loss interventions with changes in biomarkers of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179: 1262.
20.    van der Windt DJ, Sud V, Zhang H, Tsung A, Huang H. The effects of physical exercise on  fatty liver disease. Gene Expression 2018; 18: 89-101.
21.    Anania C, Perla FM, Olivero F, Pacifico L, Chiesa C. Mediterranean diet and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 2083-2094.
22.    Wijarnpreecha K, Thongprayoon C, Ungprasert P. Coffee consumption and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepat 2017; 29: e8-e12.
23.    Ganguli S, DeLeeuw P, Satapathy SK. A review of current and upcoming treatment modalities in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatic Medicine Évid Res 2019; 11: 159-178.
24.    Younossi ZM, Ratziu V, Loomba R, et al. Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 2184-2196.
 
To continue reading unlock this article
Already a subscriber?