Peer Reviewed
Women's health

Combined oral contraceptives: the GP consultation

Kathleen McNamee, Deborah Bateson, Suzanne Pearson
Abstract

The consultation with a woman requesting contraception is most often straightforward. However, some important details must be considered to decide on the most appropriate type.

The uptake of the combined oral contraceptive (COC) is about 33% among Australian women using contraception.1 This article focuses on the GP consultation for women who have chosen to initiate or continue a particular type of contraceptive. Although this consultation is often straightforward, several issues need to be considered (Box 1).

Which contraceptive method is suitable?

For women initiating contraception, all methods should be discussed including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) such as the contraceptive implant, the hormonal intrauterine system and copper intrauterine devices (IUDs).

LARCs are affordable and effective contraceptive methods that have few contraindications and high satisfaction and continuation rates.2-4 They are particularly suitable for women who find daily pill taking and/or maintaining a filled prescription difficult, or if concealment from other household members is important. If the patient wishes to continue discussing the prescription of a COC the consultation should include the following information.

Advantages of COCs

COCs are readily accessible, easily reversible, provide predictable withdrawal bleeds and allow women to manipulate their cycles to skip withdrawal bleeds. They decrease the occurrence of acne and can be used in the management of women with heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhoea, symptoms of endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder.5-16 Women taking COCs have a reduction in their risk of endometrial, ovarian and bowel cancers, as well as functional ovarian cysts and benign ovarian tumours.17-21

Disadvantages and risks of COCs

COCs have relatively high failure rates with typical use.22 There is a regular cost associated with their purchase, which is significantly higher for non-PBS formulations. The use of COCs is associated with rare but serious risks, including the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a possible increased risk of stroke and myocardial infarction.23-25 There is a small increase in the risk of cervical cancer and possibly breast cancer.26,27 COCs do not provide any protection from sexually transmitted infections so condoms are recommended for this purpose.

Contraindications to use of COCs

The UK Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health (FSRH) medical eligibility criteria (MEC) system for contraceptive use provides a framework for matching a woman’s medical and personal history with her chosen contraceptive (Table 1).4

Personal history

Risk factors for, or a past history of, VTE, arterial vascular disease, hormonally-related cancers and severe liver disease are important contraindications to consider when prescribing a COC (Table 2 and Table 2 cont.).

Common MEC 4 (absolute contraindications) include:

  • migraine with aura in the previous five years
  • smoking 15 or more cigarettes per day and over the age of 35 years
  • less than six weeks postpartum in breastfeeding women.

Common MEC 3 (relatively strong contraindications) include:

  • a body mass index of 35 kg/m2 or more
  • controlled hypertension
  • smoking up to 15 cigarettes per day and over the age of 35 years.

Family history

A history of VTE of any cause in a first-degree relative at the age of 45 years or younger is an MEC 3 for the use of COCs. Other aspects of family history such as early-onset arterial disease may prompt further risk assessment.

Medications

An IUD or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate is recommended in women taking long-term liver-enzyme inducers. These medications render COCs potentially less effective and include several anticonvulsants and antiretrovirals, as well as St John’s Wort. For women who prefer to take a COC, a higher hormonal dose is recommended but it is important to note that the 50 µg ethinyl oestradiol pills available in Australia contain insufficient progestogen for this purpose. See the FSRH advice for more detailed advice on this higher dosing regimen.28 Antibiotics, apart from rifabutin and rifampicin, do not reduce the effectiveness of COCs.

General history

Ask the patient if she has experienced any abnormal bleeding, discharge or pelvic pain. Although a COC can be initiated, further investigation might be warranted.

Examination and investigations

The only routine recommended examination for a women requesting a prescription for a COC is measurement of blood pressure and calculation of body mass index (BMI). No routine investigations are required, although the consultation can present an opportunity to discuss chlamydia testing, cervical cancer screening, and lipids and glucose testing.

Prescribing for specific populations

Young women

Young women assessed by you to be mature minors can consent to a prescription of a COC. Assess whether there is a risk of harm or abuse from sexual activity and follow relevant mandatory reporting legislation. Confidentiality and its limitations should be discussed and the young person can be seen alone for some of the consultation.

From a medical perspective, there is no lower age limit for prescribing COCs if a young woman has started menstruating.29

Postpartum

Breastfeeding

In breastfeeding women, the use of COCs is contraindicated (MEC 4) until they are at least six weeks postpartum. A recent change to guidelines, supports the use of COCs between six weeks and six months postpartum (MEC 2), although other options including progestogen-only methods may be preferable.4 Once a woman reaches six months postpartum, the use of COCs is unrestricted (MEC 1).

Non-breastfeeding

Restrictions for using COC in non-breastfeeding women are related to VTE risk, which is highest in the three weeks postpartum (Table 2 and Table 2 cont.). There are no restrictions (MEC 1) after six weeks postpartum.

After an abortion

Women should be advised to start with an active pill the day after a first or second trimester surgical or medication abortion (day after misoprostol tablets). The COC will be immediately effective.

Older women

The COC can be appropriate for medically eligible women over the age of 40 years but VTE and arterial vascular risk factors need careful consideration. Additionally, the COC can control appropriately investigated heavy menstrual bleeding and perimenopausal symptoms. Progestogen-only methods or IUDs are safer options for women over 50 years of age.30

Important points to cover

Efficacy and maintaining a supply

Although the COC is considered 99.7% effective with perfect use,31 the typical use probability of failure in the first 12 months is 7 to 10%.22 Efficacy should be explained to patients in a meaningful way, such as if 100 women take the pill for one year, about seven of them will become pregnant. It can be useful to discuss ways of remembering to take the pill, including phone reminders or apps and keeping the pill handy. Inform women how they can obtain an emergency supply from a pharmacy if they run out.32

Side effects and risks

When prescribing a woman a COC, inform them of the risks as outlined above.

Evidence about side effects with COC use is limited (see Box 2 for a list of reported side effects). Unscheduled bleeding is common initially and usually settles with time. Withdrawal bleeding may not occur, particularly with pills containing oestradiol or oestradiol valerate.33,34 Many side effects, including mood changes, lowered libido and weight changes, may be attributed to the pill but evidence is limited. It is recommended to persist with a COC for at least three months to allow side effects to settle.

Prescribing and when to start

Traditionally, COCs are started on days one to five of menstruation to ensure the woman is not pregnant. It will be immediately effective if starting with an active hormone pill. However, COCs can be started at any other stage in the cycle (‘quick start’ initiation) but will not become effective until seven days of active hormone pills have been taken. If an early pre-existing pregnancy is not excluded when quick starting the pill, advise the woman to have a urine pregnancy test four weeks after initiation, noting that a false-negative test may occur if unprotected intercourse has occurred within the previous three weeks.

Packaging varies between formulations, and in a consultation swatches available from pharmaceutical companies can be used to demonstrate the difference between active and inactive pills, which pill to start with and when the woman will be covered for contraception. Pills packaged to start with an active pill are generally easier to manage.

Usually, the patient should be given an initial prescription for four months of COC. However, a prescription for up to a 12 months’ supply can be considered for women with a low risk of arterial disease who may find it difficult to attend for earlier initial review. At review after the first four months, 12 months can be prescribed if the woman is normotensive and problem free.

Factors affecting efficacy

Missed pills

Missed pill rules are governed by the principal that ovulation may occur if there are more than seven consecutive days without hormone pills and that a pill is not considered missed until it is more than 48 hours since the last pill was taken (Flowchart).35

Vomiting and severe diarrhoea

Vomiting within two hours of taking a pill or very severe diarrhoea should be managed as for missed pills.

Providing information

Written information or links to relevant websites, especially in relation to missed pill rules, should be provided with a prescription for a COC. State or territory-based family planning services can usually offer women advice over the phone and product information might differ from some of your advice.

Skipping withdrawal bleeds

Extended or continuous use of active pills with skipped inactive pills is mostly chosen for convenience.36 These regimens can minimise withdrawal bleeding and provide relief from hormonal withdrawal symptoms including premenstrual syndrome, headaches and pelvic pain.37,38 Women with endometriosis will also benefit from an extended regimen.39 Women may choose to tri-cycle three pill packs in a row or continuously take the pill for up to 12 months or more at a time. A prepackaged extended cycle pill is available with 84 consecutive combined hormonal pills followed by seven 10 µg ethinyl oestradiol pills and another pill is available with an electronic dispensing device. These preparations allow for flexible timing of withdrawal bleeds and are available in Australia as alternative choices for women wishing to skip withdrawal bleeds.

Review and repeat pill consultations

At each repeat consultation for COC prescription, the patient should have her blood pressure measured, BMI calculated, if indicated, and any problems including side effects investigated. Specifically enquire about abnormal bleeding. Smoking, personal and family history can be updated and new medications added to the records. Discuss if she has missed any pills and review the patient’s understanding of the missed pill rules and what to do in the case of vomiting or severe diarrhoea. The benefits of switching to a LARC can be discussed if appropriate.

Conclusion

Information on personal risk factors, family history and concurrent medications is important for safe prescribing of COCs. The patient’s understanding of the consequences of missed pills should be checked at each visit. The consultation can be an opportunity to promote safe sex and chlamydia and cervical cancer screening, and to provide information about other contraceptive choices including LARCs. MT

 

COMPETING INTERESTS: Drs McNamee, Bateson and Pearson have attended advisory committees and presented at educational forums for Bayer Healthcare and MSD. Dr Bateson has also been supported to attend conferences. They have not been personally financially remunerated for these services.

 

References

1. Richters J, Fitzadam S, Yeung A, et al. Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Contraception 2016; 94: 548-555.
2. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. New Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1998-2007.
3. Diedrich JT, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Three-year continuation of reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:662 e1-8.
4. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC). Available online from: http://www.fsrh.org/ukmec (accessed July 2017).
5. Arowojolu AO, Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA. Combined oral contraceptive pills for treatment of acne. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2012; (7): CD004425.
6. Farquhar C, Brown J. Oral contraceptive pill for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (4): CD000154.
7. Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, Machlitt A, Fraser IS. Effective treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with estradiol valerate and dienogest: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 777-787.
8. Larsson G, Milsom I, Lindstedt G, Rybo G. The influence of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on menstrual blood loss and iron status. Contraception 1992; 46: 327-334.
9. Harada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y, Hoshiai H, Terakawa N. Low-dose oral contraceptive pill for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1583-1588.
10. Costello M, Shrestha B, Eden J, Sjoblom P, Johnson N. Insulin-sensitising drugs versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne and risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and endometrial cancer in polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (1): CD005552.
11. Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 14-24.
12. Joffe H, Cohen LS, Harlow BL. Impact of oral contraceptive pill use on premenstrual mood: predictors of improvement and deterioration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1523-1530.
13. Seidman DS, Yeshaya A, Ber A, et al. A prospective follow-up of two 21/7 cycles followed by two extended regimen 84/7 cycles with contraceptive pills containing ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone. Isr Med Assoc J 2010; 12: 400-405.
14. Lopez LM, Kaptein AA, Helmerhorst FM. Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (2): CD006586.
15. Pearlstein TB, Bachmann GA, Zacur HA, Yonkers KA. Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder with a new drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive formulation. Contraception 2005; 72: 414-421.
16. Yonkers KA, Brown C, Pearlstein TB, Foegh M, Sampson-Landers C, Rapkin A. Efficacy of a new low-dose oral contraceptive with drospirenone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 492-501.
17. Mueck AO, Seeger H, Rabe T. Hormonal contraception and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17: R263-271.
18. Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C, Peto R, Reeves G. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet 2008; 371: 303-314.
19. Gierisch JM, Coeytaux RR, Urrutia RP, et al. Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast, cervical, colorectal, and endometrial cancers: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22: 1931-1943.
20. Holt VL, Cushing-Haugen KL, Daling JR. Oral contraceptives, tubal sterilization, and functional ovarian cyst risk. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 252-258.
21. Westhoff C, Britton JA, Gammon MD, Wright T, Kelsey JL. Oral contraceptive and benign ovarian tumors. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 242-246.
22. Sundaram A, Vaughan B, Kost K, et al. Contraceptive failure in the United States: estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2017; 49: 7-16.
23. Weill A, Dalichampt M, Raguideau F, et al. Low dose oestrogen combined oral contraception and risk of pulmonary embolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction in five million French women: cohort study. BMJ 2016; 353: i2002.
24. Plu-Bureau G, Hugon-Rodin J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Canonico M. Hormonal contraceptives and arterial disease: an epidemiological update. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 27: 35-45.
25. Roach RE, Helmerhorst FM, Lijfering WM, Stijnen T, Algra A, Dekkers OM. Combined oral contraceptives: the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (8): CD011054.
26. Vessey M, Yeates D. Oral contraceptive use and cancer: final report from the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study. Contraception 2013; 88: 678-683.
27. Iversen L, Sivasubramaniam S, Lee AJ, Fielding S, Hannaford PC. Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 580.e1-580.e9.
28. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FSRH). CEU clinical guidance: drug interactions with hormonal contraception – January 2017. London: FSRH; 2017. Available online at: https://www.fsrh.org/documents/ceu-guidance-drug-interactions-with-hormonal-contraception-jan (accessed July 2017).
29. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FSRH). FSRH clinical guidance: contraceptive choices for young people (March 2010). London: FSRH; 2010. Available online at: https://www.fsrh.org/documents/cec-ceu-guidance-young-people-mar 2010 (accessed July 2017).
30. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FSRH). FSRH clinical guidance: contraception for women aged over 40 Years (July 2010). London: FSRH; 2010. Available online at: https://www.fsrh.org/documents/cec-ceu-guidance-womenover40-jul 2010 (accessed July 2017).
31. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011; 83: 397-404.
32. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Continued dispensing scenarios for pharmacists. Canberra: Pharmaceutical Society of Australia; 2013. Available online at: https://www.psa.org.au/download/ent/uploads/filebase/guidelines/medication-management/continued-dispensing-scenarios.pdf (accessed July 2017).
33. Mansour D, Verhoeven C, Sommer W, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17beta-oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in a 21/7 regimen. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011; 16: 430-443.
34. Palacios S, Wildt L, Parke S, Machlitt A, Romer T, Bitzer J. Efficacy and safety of a novel oral contraceptive based on oestradiol (oestradiol valerate/dienogest): a phase III trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 149: 57-62.
35. Family Planning New South Wales, Family Planning Victoria and True Relationships and Reproductive Health. Contraception: an Australian clinical practice handbook, 4th ed. Family Planning New South Wales, Family Planning Victoria and True Relationships and Reproductive Health; 2016.
36. Lakehomer H, Kaplan PF, Wozniak DG, Minson CT. Characteristics of scheduled bleeding manipulation with combined hormonal contraception in university students. Contraception 2013; 88: 426-430.
37. Edelman A, Micks E, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, Grimes DA. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (7): CD004695.
38. Halbreich U, Freeman EW, Rapkin AJ, et al. Continuous oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Contraception 2012; 85: 19-27.
39. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 400-412.
To continue reading unlock this article
Already a subscriber?